What Determines the Domain for Inverses of Quadratic Equations?

thornluke
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I'm really confused in finding the domain of quadratic equations.

For example: when finding a suitable domain so that an inverse exists, why is the domain of x2-4 x>0
whilst,
the domain of 2x2+3 is x≥0

Can the domain of x2-4 be x≥0?

Furthermore, what is the largest domain and how do I know whether or not it is the largest?

Thanks,
Thorn.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
thornluke said:
Hi guys,

I'm really confused in finding the domain of quadratic equations.

For example: when finding a suitable domain so that an inverse exists, why is the domain of x2-4 x>0
whilst,
the domain of 2x2+3 is x≥0

Can the domain of x2-4 be x≥0?

Furthermore, what is the largest domain and how do I know whether or not it is the largest?

Thanks,
Thorn.
The assumptions you make for your first question are wrong. The domains of the two functions x^2- 4 and 2x^2+ 3 are not different. There exist an infinite number of domains on which x^2- 4 or 2x^2+ 3 are "one-to-one" and so have inverses. x\ge 0 and any subset of that are such domains. So are x\le 0 and any subsets of that.

As for finding the largest domain (which is what is normally meant by "domain" without other condition), look at the graph. For these quadratics, the simplest thing to do is to find the vertex of each parabola. For x^2- 4, the vertex is (0, -4) and for 2x^2+ 3, it is (0, 3).

Each parabola "turns back" at its vertex so you have two different x values, on either side of the vertex, with the same y value- the function is not "one to one". As long as your set lies on one side of the vertex, it is a domain on which the function is invertible. A largest possible such domain is all points on one side of the vertex together with the vertex itself. Since the two functions, x^2- 4 and 2x^2+ 3 both have vertex at x= 0, there are two such "largest domains", x\ge 0 and x\le 0, for both.

Also, since this question has nothing to do with "Abstract and Linear Algebra", I am moving it to "General Math".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top