What determines the orientation of a vector space?

yifli
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
A non-zero alternating tensor w splits the bases of V into two disjoint groups, those with \omega(v_1,\cdots,v_n)>0 and those for which \omega(v_1,\cdots,v_n)<0.

So when we speak of the orientation of a vector space, we need to say the orientation with respect to a certain tensor, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi yifli! :smile:

You are correct, specifying the tensor will specify the orientation of the vector space.
However, what we usually do is specifying the positive bases directly. In \mathbb{R}^3, for example, these bases are determined by the right-hand rule. Also note that specifying a positive basis, is equivalent to specifying a certain tensor (since there exist a unique tensor that sends this basis to 1).
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top