What determines whether or not snow sticks to my windshield?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ori Vandewalle
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of snow accumulation on windshields, specifically addressing why snow sticks when a car is stationary but slides off at speeds above 10 mph (4.5 m/s). Key factors include the balance between the drag force exerted by moving air and the frictional force between snowflakes and the windshield. The estimated coefficient of friction (μk) between snow and glass is calculated to be approximately 0.53, suggesting that variations in snowflake shape and size significantly impact this interaction. The conversation highlights the complexities of fluid mechanics and the need for precise measurements in determining these coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly forces and motion.
  • Familiarity with fluid mechanics concepts, including drag force.
  • Knowledge of coefficients of friction and their significance in physics.
  • Basic mathematical skills for estimating physical parameters.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the drag coefficient of irregular shapes, specifically snowflakes.
  • Explore methods for measuring the coefficient of friction between snow and glass.
  • Learn about the terminal velocity of different types of snowflakes.
  • Investigate the effects of windshield angle on snow accumulation and sliding.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics enthusiasts, automotive engineers, meteorologists, and anyone interested in the dynamics of snow accumulation on vehicles.

Ori Vandewalle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
It snowed last week and I noticed that, when my car was stationary, snow built up on the windshield, but above about 10 mph (4.5 m/s, if SI units are required here), the snow didn't stick. I'm wondering what accounts for the difference.

My first thought was that the extra kinetic energy of my car's motion would be enough to sublimate falling snowflakes. After a few mathematical missteps, however, I determined that my car would have to be going about a thousand times faster than I was willing to drive it to get the required amount of energy. That is to say, this was too little energy by a factor of about a million.

Which leaves me at somewhat of a loss. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the temperature of my windshield plays a role, but I can't see how my car moving forward would affect that equation.

The only other thought that comes to mind is that the air my car pushes through might exert some pressure on an incoming snowflake, such that the snowflake isn't able to land. But the physics I've taken was a little light on fluid mechanics, so I'm not sure how to proceed from there.

Any help you folks can provide would be greatly appreciated. I don't even require anyone to spell out the answer for me; if I can be pointed in the right direction, I'll try to work out the problem myself.

Some relevant factoids: Wiki says a typical snowflake is 1019 water molecules, which would give it a mass of about 3x10-7 kg, and I estimated that a snowflake's terminal velocity is somewhere around 1 m/s from this paper.

Thanks.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Ori Vandewalle! :smile:

Snow sticks due to friction.
When you drive at speed, the air exerts a force (drag).
When the force of the air is greater that the required friction to stick, the snow flakes will slide off.
 
Heh. The physics I've taken certainly wasn't light on objects sliding along inclined planes. I really should have guessed that myself. Thanks!

There is a wrinkle, though, which is that finding the coefficient of friction between snow and glass is not exactly easy. What I can do is accept your hypothesis as true, guess that my 10 mph estimate is accurate, and see if a reasonable μ pops out of the force equation. Doing that, I've got friction and weight pulling the snowflake down the windshield, and drag pushing it up.

With an esimate of 3x10-7 kg for the snow, the drag coefficient of a sphere for the snowflake (.1), a circular snowflake with a diameter of 1 cm, and a 40° angle for my windshield, I get a μk of .53. Looking around at other coefficients of friction for snow, I bet this is a little high, which means the critical speed is lower (likely) and/or my rough estimate of the shape and size of a snowflake is wrong (very likely).

But hey, at least the results aren't entirely unreasonable.
 
I wouldn't know what the drag coefficient of a snowflake is.
It's not really spherical.

And I wouldn't know what the coefficient of friction is either.
It's not really a nicely defined mass with more or less smooth edges.

I guess the best way to find out is by trying it out.
And I suspect that different types of snow flakes exhibit significantly different behavior.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
21K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K