What do electromagnetic waves look like in 3 dimensions?

In summary, electromagnetic waves do not have a specific appearance in 3 dimensions as they cannot be seen with the naked eye. However, they are often represented as a sine wave in textbooks to illustrate the amplitude of the electric and magnetic fields. The wavelength of electromagnetic waves can vary from gamma rays to X-rays and beyond, with no theoretical limit to how short the wavelength can be. They can also be viewed as classical waves or as quantum particles called photons. MIT has a helpful visualization of electromagnetic waves on their website.
  • #1
Joza
139
0
What do electromagnetic waves look like in 3 dimensions?

In my textbooks etc. they are always represented as the standard sine wave. But what about actual 3 dimensions?

Are there waves with smaller wavelengths than gamma waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Joza said:
What do electromagnetic waves look like in 3 dimensions?
They don't really look like anything - I mean what would you look at them with? The sin wave is just a way to picture the amplitude of the electric and magnetic fields. It's not always a good picture and causes a lot of confusion when you come to study polarisation.

Are there waves with smaller wavelengths than gamma waves?
X-rays? Light can have a continuous range of wavelengths, the names attached for them are just conveniences - there is no discrete difference between gamma, UV,light, IR, radio etc.
I don't know if there is a theoretical limit to the maximum energy of a photon - if not then there is no limit to how short a wavelength you could have.
 
  • #3
Joza said:
What do electromagnetic waves look like in 3 dimensions?

In my textbooks etc. they are always represented as the standard sine wave. But what about actual 3 dimensions?

Are there waves with smaller wavelengths than gamma waves?

b) They call high energy photons gamma rays, though
that's just a name. You could have arbitrarily high
energy photons with arbitrarily high frequency and
arbitrarily short wavelength. I don't recall that there's
a limit as to how short the wavelength can be and have
it still be something you could 'call' a gamma ray.
The main thing is that past certain limits it becomes
VERY difficult for gamma rays to be produced with any
higher energies. Nuclear reactions often produce gamma
rays. Matter and antimatter annihilations produce even
higher energy gamma rays.
And some very extreme cases involving things like
black holes, supernovae, etc. can produce quite intense
high energy gamma ray bursts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray_burst

The practical 'limit' is essentially how high energy of
a matter-anti-matter collision you could have in the
universe, and above certain limits they just don't happen
often in ways we can (or would want to directly!) observe.


a) That gets 'complicated' well not really complicated, but
it's a matter of interpretation. You can view an
electromagnetic wave as a classical (classical physics E/M
theory) wave. The wave has an electric field strength E,
a magnetic field strength H, and the E vector is at right
angles to the H vector in free space. Being a transverse
wave E and H both are at right angles to the direction
of propagation in free space.
The E and H are just intensity vectors of field components,
at any given point in space and time, though, and
aren't really saying anything about the 'shape' of the
overall field or photon unless you add additional
equations or information to say how E and H vary in
space to get the 'shape' of the field. How E and H vary
in TIME and SPACE, though, in areas free of SOURCES
of new EM waves is dictated by Maxwell's equations so
they'll tell you how an EM wave, once created, will
move in time and space.

However you can also look at EM fields as composed of
quantum particles called photons, and then you can use
QED theory to look at the 'shape' of the photons in
terms of their probability of having a given E or H
field intensity and detection probability at any given
point in space and time. There's no fixed 'shape' to
a photon since that depends on its emission process and
the environment it's traveling in. You could 'localize' a
photon inside a 'box' and of course see wave functions
and resonance type effects versus the size of the box and
wavelength of the photon.

Something like a low frequency manmade radio transmitter
can produce something like a continuous coherent
'plane wave' or almost 'spherical wave' of waves that
have fields that look like your classical smooth amplitude
perfectly coherent sine waves flowing outward forever.

Something like an atom that emits a photon from
spontaneous emission though will pretty much emit
a photon with some relatively discrete direction and
as a wave-train that is sort of like a damped sine wave,
initially strong then decaying to zero after a few dozen
sine cycles...


like
 
  • #5
This is a great site from MIT which shows videos of exactly what you're asking for.

http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-02TSpring-2005/Visualizations/detail/light.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What are electromagnetic waves?

Electromagnetic waves are a form of energy that is created by the movement of electrically charged particles. These waves are characterized by their electric and magnetic fields, which oscillate perpendicular to each other and to the direction of propagation.

2. How do electromagnetic waves travel in 3 dimensions?

Electromagnetic waves travel in a straight line in all directions in 3-dimensional space. This means that they can travel up and down, left and right, and forward and backward. They do not require a medium, such as air or water, to travel through.

3. Can we see electromagnetic waves in 3 dimensions?

No, electromagnetic waves are not visible to the human eye in 3 dimensions. This is because they have a much shorter wavelength than visible light, which is the only type of electromagnetic wave that is visible to us. However, we can use instruments, such as telescopes and microscopes, to detect and measure these waves.

4. Do electromagnetic waves have a color in 3 dimensions?

No, electromagnetic waves do not have a color in 3 dimensions. Colors are a characteristic of visible light, which is only a small portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. The color of an object is determined by the wavelengths of light that it reflects or absorbs, but this does not apply to other types of electromagnetic waves.

5. How do we represent electromagnetic waves in 3 dimensions?

Electromagnetic waves are often represented as sinusoidal waves in 3 dimensions. The amplitude of the wave represents the strength of the electric and magnetic fields, while the wavelength represents the distance between two consecutive peaks or troughs. The direction of propagation is represented by the direction in which the wave is traveling.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
844
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
65
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top