What do engineers, physicists and mathematicians really do?

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ju00611
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicists
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the day-to-day activities and realities of careers in engineering, physics, and mathematics. Participants explore the differences and similarities in job roles, expectations, and the nature of work in these fields, including theoretical and applied aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a common perception of scientists as primarily engaged in writing equations and conducting experiments, but others clarify that much of the work involves paperwork, computer-based tasks, and collaboration.
  • A participant describes their daily activities in various roles, including designing experimental setups, maintaining equipment, developing software, and engaging in project management and client presentations.
  • Another participant discusses the collaborative nature of problem-solving in fields like protein simulation, highlighting the distinct contributions of engineers, physicists, and mathematicians.
  • Some participants note that while engineering may appear more employable, the blending of roles across physics, engineering, and mathematics complicates the decision-making process for students.
  • There is mention of the importance of communication and presentation skills in scientific and technical jobs, which may not align with traditional perceptions of these careers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of work in these fields, with varying opinions on the balance of theoretical versus practical tasks and the degree of paperwork involved. Multiple competing views remain regarding the daily realities of these careers.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a range of experiences and expectations, with some participants emphasizing the variability in job roles and responsibilities based on specific fields and individual career paths.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering degrees in engineering, physics, or mathematics, as well as individuals interested in understanding the practical applications and daily realities of these professions.

Ju00611
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm torn between these three degrees and honestly it's hard to know what these degree will actually get you into. For those of you who work in these fields: what do you ACTUALLY do on a day-to-day basis? What's a list of things you do on the job during a typical day?

The reason I ask is that a lot of (great) images come to mind when you think of these careers. I picture someone writing equations on a blackboard to solve problems, or doing cool experiments to get data. Some of what I've read online says that in reality, a lot of these jobs are just like anything else: mostly paperwork, conferences, and sitting at a computer all day. This certainly doesn't fit the picture I get in my head when I think "scientist". Are physics, engineering, and math jobs really like this? Does any job actually exist where you're paid to sit down and think of solutions to math/science problems?

Just for reference, I'm currently in grade 12 and plan on getting either a masters or phd in whichever of these fields I choose.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ju00611 said:
I picture someone writing equations on a blackboard to solve problems, or doing cool experiments to get data.
These things do happen in physics, but what you must realize is that it is not a major part of the job. Black/white boards are used mainly for discussions with others or for teaching. If you are doing things by hand it would probably be more common to write on paper, but the computer is also an invaluable tool for both computation and simulations. When it comes to experiments, standing in a lab is not the typical thing needed to do them, at least not in high-energy physics. Collaborations work for a very long time to produce a working experiment that can give you data. A large part of it is programming software for the experiment itself and for data analysis.

This being said, all jobs come with downsides, administration, etc. Also, who told you going to conferences is not fun? ;)
 
Ju00611 said:
I'm torn between these three degrees and honestly it's hard to know what these degree will actually get you into. For those of you who work in these fields: what do you ACTUALLY do on a day-to-day basis? What's a list of things you do on the job during a typical day?

The reason I ask is that a lot of (great) images come to mind when you think of these careers. I picture someone writing equations on a blackboard to solve problems, or doing cool experiments to get data. Some of what I've read online says that in reality, a lot of these jobs are just like anything else: mostly paperwork, conferences, and sitting at a computer all day. This certainly doesn't fit the picture I get in my head when I think "scientist". Are physics, engineering, and math jobs really like this? Does any job actually exist where you're paid to sit down and think of solutions to math/science problems?

Just for reference, I'm currently in grade 12 and plan on getting either a masters or phd in whichever of these fields I choose.

How do you think a skyscraper gets built? A sports stadium? A car? An airplane? The computer you are using to surf the web?

At some point, the mathematician, the physicist, and an engineer had a hand in creating the devices, the vehicles, and structures you take for granted in your everyday life.

A lot of modern life depends on paperwork, but not everything is paperwork. People don't mind so much when they receive a piece of paper which says "Pay to the order of ..."
Some engineers sit in offices all day; others are out in the field, surveying the site where a new building will be built.

The video which you stream on your computer could be made available to you because physicists and mathematicians were able to figure out how to send large amounts of data in a short amount of time without losing so much of the data in the process that you couldn't receive a movie or picture which made sense.
 
I do / did mainly the following things on a daily basis in different jobs no matter if this was when working on my PhD (applied physics), then as 'staff scientist' in industry, or now as a 'consulting engineer':

- Designing an experimental setup, picking vendors and products for building it, and instructing technical staff or contractors when building it.
- Maintain experimental setups - fixing issues with sensors, pumps, electrical wiring etc. - if this was not standard off-the-shelf equipment but specifically designed for that experiment by myself.
- Develop software to automate the experimental setup and/or to analyze the data gathered.
- Quality management, check for reproducible results and experimental conditions, make sure no errors had occurred, organization, processes, documentation.
- Write up the results for presentation to different audiences. Back then it was was research papers and conferences, today it is presenting engineering solutions to potential clients. (I believe marketing, outreach, and presentation to lay audiences become more and more important in any science / tech job)
- Administration of some sort - project management, project controlling, planning, forecasting, reporting - as needed by: funding governmental agency, an employer (a corporation) or today for my own small business.
- Discussing issues with colleagues (the creative part is often teamwork), meetings with clients / bosses / collaborators from other organizations.
 
Well let's take a problem which involves all three and see where they differ. The problem is simulating a protein in a cell membrane.

Engineers:Electrical engineers/computer engineers built all of the devices and have optimized them over the decades (the CPU, GPU, hard drives, memory etc).
Physicists: The theory and many of the algorithms used to simulate the protein are invented by physicists. Of course they run the simulations.
Mathematicians: Applied mathematicians will sometimes work on algorithms and tools used by physicists, such as Markov models. The question is, once I'm trying to compute something from the model, how do I do it? Oftentimes physicists figure this out, but occasionally mathematicians will get interested in coming up with new ways to compute things and will figure out something the physicists did not. Other times they will generalize what the physicist has done and try to make rigorous, formal arguments which the physicists do not read.
 
Thanks for the replies, it's a really tough choice but I'll have to make a decision soon. I'm tending to lean towards engineering because it seems to be the most employable from what this guy (and a lot of others) have said:
Anyone ever see his videos before or know if he's a reliable source? He seems pretty down to Earth and realistic.
 
Ju00611 said:
I'm torn between these three degrees and honestly it's hard to know what these degree will actually get you into. For those of you who work in these fields: what do you ACTUALLY do on a day-to-day basis? What's a list of things you do on the job during a typical day?

The reason I ask is that a lot of (great) images come to mind when you think of these careers. I picture someone writing equations on a blackboard to solve problems, or doing cool experiments to get data. Some of what I've read online says that in reality, a lot of these jobs are just like anything else: mostly paperwork, conferences, and sitting at a computer all day. This certainly doesn't fit the picture I get in my head when I think "scientist". Are physics, engineering, and math jobs really like this? Does any job actually exist where you're paid to sit down and think of solutions to math/science problems?
Well it's not so simple as math, physics and engineering as separate fields. There is a lot of blending and blurring of lines. Much of physics and engineering is mathematically intensive. Some folks to pure math or theoretical physics, while others do applied math, applied physics and engineering (which is more or less applied physics). Individuals may do theoretical work or experimental work, or both, and often there is a team of mathematicians, physicists and engineers working on understanding and/or developing some physical system that accomplishes some useful work.

All three fields are broad and have numerous sub-disciplines.

Example of the research -
http://www.pnnl.gov/science/about.asp
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/
http://computing.ornl.gov/cse/

http://www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/programs-aavp.htm
http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forresearchers/researchbizops/index.html

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/groups/science/default.aspx
http://www.research.ibm.com/university/awards/phdfellowship.shtml
http://www.geglobalresearch.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
764
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K