What do I need to know to study calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Rev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Study
AI Thread Summary
To study calculus effectively, a solid understanding of algebra, Euclidean geometry, and trigonometry is essential, as these are the primary prerequisites. A strong grasp of algebra will facilitate a smoother learning experience in calculus. Recommended textbooks include Spivak, Apostol, and Courant for their theoretical depth, while Stewart is suggested for those seeking a more accessible introduction. Additionally, familiarity with functions, difference quotients, and basic graphing is necessary for calculus readiness. Logic is also beneficial for advanced math studies, particularly in honors calculus.
The Rev
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
What are the prerequisites?

In High School, we had Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II (Intermediate Algebra), Trigonometry, and pre-calc classes, and you took them in that order. Do I only need the basics of Algebra, Euclidean Geometry and Trigonometry to start with calculus? Or are there other topics that would really help?

Also, if you know any good textbook recommendations for any of these areas, I would appreciate hearing them.

Thanks!

:approve:

The Rev
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes... algebra trig, and euclidean geometry are pretty much the major pre-reqs ( I consider pre-calc just a combination of the first two plus the transcendentals ln, e, log etc..)

Just to note, the better you are at algebra the easier time you'll have with calculus.

Texts:
The three classics are Spivak, Apostol, And Courant. They are also very challenging, but will really teach you the theory of calculus, not just how to use the formulas.

Just about all the others are considered cookbooks ie: they teach you the formulas, but not much of the theory.
-of the most recommended here is probably Stewart. If your not a math-wiz or you don't like a challenge, it might be best to start here and then move on to one of the three above.

edit: As far as a subject that would help, but is not necessary, would be logic (good for all math).
 
Last edited:
I think Stewart is just fine, especially with the appendix on "proofs of selected theorems." He still does epsilon-delta, doesn't he?

In conjunction with Stewart, you also should at least glance at the books by Hughes-Hallet, the Harvard folk responsible for "Calculus reform." I'll let the other people here point out the defeciencies in the reform approach.

In terms of prerequisites, you should be able to take a function and calculate a difference quotient:
(f(x+h)-f(x))/h and simplify it completely for, for starters, functions like

Sqrt[x], 1/x, x^2, x^3, 1/x^2, and -x^2-3x+1.

You should understand the difference between
x+1
and
(x^2-1)/(x-1).

You should be able to graph basic functions like
x^n (n integer), x^n (n rational), a x^2+b x+c, Trig[x] (Trig=one of the six circular functions from trigonometry), Exp[x], Log[x], and for an f listed above, something of the form a f[b x+c] + d.

You should be able to solve algebraic inequalities like
(x^2+4x+4)/(x-1) > 0.

There's I suspect more prerequisites but that's all the jumps out at me at this time.

As far as Spivak goes, my philosophy is to try out someone like Hemmingway before someone like that Russian dude who wrote War and Peace. But I would recommend trying Spivak, et al, but to not let yourself get too frustrated with the knowledge that those are some fairly hard core books.
 
the main prereq for cookbook calc is algebra. for honors calc logic is important.


i recommend an old old college algebra book. much better than any new "precalc" book.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Back
Top