What do positrons have to do with dark matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DiracPool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark matter Matter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the connection between excess positrons detected by the AMS experiment and dark matter. The positron excess is theorized to result from annihilation events involving dark matter particles in the Milky Way. However, the uncertainty surrounding dark matter's nature raises questions about the validity of attributing positrons to these annihilation events. While some models suggest that these positrons could originate from local dark matter, alternative explanations, such as pulsars, are also considered. Ultimately, the detection of excess positrons does not confirm dark matter's existence but indicates that if certain hypotheses about dark matter interactions are correct, positrons should be present.
DiracPool
Messages
1,242
Reaction score
515
In referring to the recent results of the AMS experiment in the ISS:

http://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/40

I'm still left wanting of understanding why the presence of an excess of positrons infiltrating the device isometrically indicates a presence of dark matter and tells me something about it.

What I'm getting is that this positron excess is supposed to be reflective of annihilation events in the dark matter. From the article:

But a more exciting possibility is that the positrons come from the annihilation of dark matter particles, which may populate the Milky Way and its halo [6]. Dark matter is, after all, a dominant form of the matter-energy budget of the Universe, but we don’t know its particle nature or how it interacts with itself and with normal matter (other than through gravitational interactions

But if we don't know what dark matter is, how can we say that annihilation events would produce excess positrons, or positrons at all? I don't know if I'm feeling my 2 billions dollars working for me here. Can someone enlighten me?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The energy believed necessary for dark particle annihilation suggests positrons must be created. The excess of positrons detected suggests particle creation events that cannot be accounted for by processes within our galaxy. It is possible they could be from extragalactic sources, but, positrons probably cannot survive the vast distances involved. That suggests a local source of unseen matter must be involved [i.e., dark matter].
 
Last edited:
No one claims they’ve detected dark matter because of the tiny excess of positrons detected. All they can say is that if one particular version of the WIMP (self-annihilation) hypothesis is true then they would expect some positrons. They correctly remind us these positrons may come from somewhere else, for instance, Pulsars. The WIMP models have several epicycles: Check out Neil Weiner of NYU who postulated some excess positrons from the PAMELA experiment were due to WIMP collisions. Later, Lisa Randall of Harvard added this new twist: there may be two types of WIMPS and only some small fraction of them would interact with each other via a new “dark force”. Not very likely, in my opinion, because this WIMP self-interacting epicycle would require a new complication: the “dark photon”.
http://www.newscientist.com/article...tale-hints-at-shadow-milky-way.html?full=true
 
Back
Top