News What do you think about: The ebtrance of Turkey in the EU?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ardian007
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Turkey meets some economic criteria for EU membership, including GDP and debt-to-GDP ratios, but significant human rights issues remain a major barrier. The recent murder of a prominent Turkish-Armenian editor highlights ongoing human rights violations, which need to be addressed for Turkey's EU bid to progress. Additionally, Turkey's recognition of Cyprus and historical events related to the Ottoman Empire complicate its accession. Public sentiment in Europe largely opposes Turkey's membership, viewing it as more of a risk than a benefit. Overall, while Turkey shows potential for EU integration, substantial hurdles must be overcome, and the timeline for membership remains uncertain.
ardian007
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I think in generall terms, Turkey, fulfills the criterias of entering in Europe, the three main ones are: a) GDP equal or less than three percent, b) Dept/GDP plus or minus 15 percent and c) it has a sustainable growth? do the Baltic countries have any higher standard of living higher than the Turkey?
Your answers should be based on facts and arguments should be critical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose in general terms Turkey may fulfill the criteria, what at least will take quite a bit of time, say 10-15 years, is to abolish human rights violations and get treatment of minorities to a civil level for starters. I'd say they are making progress, but the timespan for admittance still looks to be quite long.
 
Disappointing news for those that have been following this story:

A prominent Turkish-Armenian editor, convicted in 2005 of insulting Turkish identity, has been shot dead outside his newspaper's office in Istanbul.

Crowds of Hrant Dink's colleagues and supporters gathered at the scene, chanting their outrage at his murder.

Dink was given a six-month suspended sentence in October 2005 after writing about the Armenian "genocide" of 1915.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6279241.stm

How Turkey handles this may have a big role in determining how their bid to join the EU is negotiated.
 
Turkey's problem with becoming a member of EU is not (just?) the economy, but the human rights perspective.
 
ardian007 said:
I think in generall terms, Turkey, fulfills the criterias of entering in Europe, the three main ones are: a) GDP equal or less than three percent, b) Dept/GDP plus or minus 15 percent and c) it has a sustainable growth? do the Baltic countries have any higher standard of living higher than the Turkey?
Your answers should be based on facts and arguments should be critical?

In that case my only criticism is their human rights issues, if they can show these are no longer issues, then we should allow them to join.
 
Turkey has some hurdles to jump if it wants to join the EU...

Cyprus
Genocide
Economy
GeographyYou can't join the EU unless you recognise all countries int the EU. Right now they dont, because of Cyprus. They also need to recognise what happened during the fall of the Ottoman Empire, that being the murder of many Christians because of their faith., a fact which is ratified by LAW in some EU countries. The economy of Turkey is also a problem, as it is substandard, and finally only a very small percentage if Turkey is actually in Europe, that being Asia Minor, or Thrace, Istanbul being the border between Europe and Asia. The one thing Turkey has going for it is its consumer base, the EU would benefit from that, however I think it would be a massive drain on the EU's economy before it would ever have a positive effect.

So I doubt they will never Join, but the process to joining (The carrot) has been good for Turkey.. I don't think they will ever be let in IMHO due to these differences.

As for the Balkans economy V Turkey. I would say most if not all of the EU countries in the Balkans Economy is better than that of Turkey. Would you disagree with that, and what do your believe *is* the Balkan region, because that definition is paramount to the arguement?
 
Last edited:
Gokul43201 said:
Disappointing news for those that have been following this story:



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6279241.stm

How Turkey handles this may have a big role in determining how their bid to join the EU is negotiated.

The problem with Turkey joining the EU is that the people on the street on the whole don't want them in. They don't see any positive to letting them in, and only negative. I can't see how Politics or Propaganda could change that. Really the biggest driver of this process is the American government, because they have self interests to having Turkey in the EU. The EU has more to loose than gain by allowing them to join. So any real Risk analysis done on this would finish on a NO right now. perhaps this will change in years/decades to come. But at this present time IMHO its a NO.
 
Anttech said:
As for the Balkans economy V Turkey. I would say most if not all of the EU countries in the Balkans Economy is better than that of Turkey. Would you disagree with that, and what do your believe *is* the Balkan region, because that definition is paramount to the arguement?
He said Baltic...:wink:
 
ohh.. I missread it, I presume he ment Balkan region as the Baltic region is nothing to do with Turkey, nor ever has done. Anyway the countries arround the Baltic sea, are a lot richer than Turkey.

We will never know tho.. the inital question was posted in 2004 :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
7K
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
75
Views
7K
Back
Top