What does 0 amplitude mean in waves and quantum physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Waves
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
When a wave for light or an electron is represented on a graph, it is shown with the y-axis representing amplitude. Now, these waves cross the x-axis (where amplitude=0) but what does this actually mean, for that instant? Is it that the wave is no longer observed for that instant?

Also, since all objects have their own wavefunctions, what does the concept of 0 amplitude mean? Is the object not observed for that one instant as well?

I'm new to the concept of the wave properties of matter and quantum physics as a whole, so any clarification on the above matters (and other related material, if you wish) would be greatly appreciated!

:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The modulus squared of the wave function is the probability (density) to find the particle at a point (region) in a position measurement. If the amplitude is zero, you won't find the particle at this point (region).
 
Okay. So since all objects have a wavefunction, what exactly does it mean for the object (ex. couch) to have a 0 probability?
Does it cease to exist at some infinitesimal point that we just never see?
 
MathewsMD said:
Okay. So since all objects have a wavefunction, what exactly does it mean for the object (ex. couch) to have a 0 probability?
Before you perform a measurement, quantum systems don't have a definite value for the physical quantity you measure. If the wave function is zero in some region, the particle is not in this region. But you can't say where it is with certainty. The probability to find it in a region with a large amplitude is simply higher than in a region with a low amplitude. So it is very unlikely to find the particle in the region where it's wave function has a node.
 
I think the obvious is being overlooked - just because a wave occupies a zero value at some point in time (or space) does not mean the amplitude is zero at that time (space).

Amplitude is the magnitude of a complex number. The value of the field is the projection of the complex number onto the real axis.

Claude.
 
Nevertheless it does mean that the probability of locating a particle at that point, or probability of "particle" manifesting itself into a particle if measured at that point, is zero. Isn't it?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top