There is no good current link I can find except to a very popular science "article" on Netflix,
"Explained: memory"
Which I recommend if you can access it. And I realize this is unfairly limiting, but it is what I have as an overview. And most good references are behind paywalls.
A lot of the comments so far lack sources, and tend to be anecdotal - which, after looking at research and reviewing the Netflix documentary, I can see why. For example: The equivalent of Scientific American for this field is, IMO, Psychology Today:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/usYou judge.
Points:
1. Memory is a series of somewhat interconnected brain areas. It does does not work the way we think. Nor is it more accurate or substantially better among individual normally healthy people. People with demonstrably better memories got there by learning how to exploit built-in traits with techniques like the "memory palace".
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000169181200145XGoogle for "NIH memory training".
2. Evolution drove memory usage as more of a tool to predict the future (using experience, i.e., bits of memory) than recalling events. This facilitated planning and cooperation:
Evolution of declarative memory
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hipo.20205 -- note this is the journal "Hippocampus"
and so is focused on this one area of the brain that stores, references, and assembles memories
3. Laboratory interview results with large numbers of eye witnesses indicates that even people with good memories have an accuracy rate well below 50%. Recall is embedded in disparate areas of the brain, and so reconstruction of memories on demand is solidly less wonderful than we personally believe. Lots of spurious images and emotions show up.
So the OP's point of having a good memory is related to the fact s/he likely learned memory techniques early on. For all normal brains, most memories are a lot more incorrect than the person making the claims of accuracy deeply believes. See abstract:
Repeated recall, retention interval, and the accuracy–confidence relation in eyewitness memory
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acp.1263