What is the meaning of canonical in quantum mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter captain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
what does it mean in quantum mechanics when they say canonical variables or canonical momentum? what is the difference from regular momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Read the bottom of this page under physics:

http://www.answers.com/canonical&r=67

To paraphrase: Any two variables whose Poisson Bracket (or Commutator in Quantum) that give a delta are canonical. A symmetry in one canonical variable implies the other is conserved. For example, translational invariance and conservation of momentum.

Cheers,
Norm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Norman said:
...To paraphrase: Any two variables whose Poisson Bracket (or Commutator in Quantum) that give a delta are canonical.

Not exactly. For example, in single particle quantum mechanics in the presence of an external electromagnetic field the canonical variables are the position \vec x and the *canonical* momentum \vec p which satisfy:
<br /> [x_j,p_k]=i\hbar\delta_{jk}\;.<br />

But, if the above holds, it should also be obvious that the *mechanical* momentum \vec \pi =\vec p-e\vec A where e is the charge also satisfies:
<br /> [x_j,\pi_k]=i\hbar\delta_{jk}\;.<br />

Thus, both sets of variables satisfy canonical communtation relations even though only the set (x,p) are called "canonical variables."
 
thanks for your help
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
257
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Back
Top