What does couples as the 4th component of a vector mean in the Dirac equation?

xahdoom
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What does "couples as the 4th component of a vector" mean in the Dirac equation?

I'm doing an exercise regarding the spin-orbit operator and the Dirac equation/particles, and I'm having trouble understanding the link between terminology and mathematics. The particular phrase I'm having trouble with is:

"Investigate how the matrix operator β \Sigma \cdot J commutes with the Hamiltonian for a Dirac particle in a central potential V(r) that couples as the 4th component of a vector"

I've understood the sentence up until "Hamiltonian for a Dirac..."

I didn't consider this a homework question - more of a terminology question - because I've seen this language in textbooks as well. My trouble is that a) I'm not sure what this means in terms of mathematics and how it affects the standard Dirac Hamiltonian and more importantly b) I don't understand what this means conceptually.

If anyone can explain to me what the phrase "couples as the 4th component of a vector" means, or point me towards a piece of literature that would explain, I would be extremely grateful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


For the Schrodinger equation which is nonrelativistic, all you need to give to describe a central potential is V(r). But for coupling to a Dirac particle it matters how the central potential transforms under a Lorentz transformation - whether the potential is a scalar V(r), the time component V0(r) of a vector, or the time-time component V00(r) of a tensor. He wants you to assume it is V0(r).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top