What does it mean for a charge to be uniformly distributed on a spherical shell?

AI Thread Summary
A uniformly charged spherical shell with radius R spinning at a constant angular velocity ω generates a surface current density defined by K = σv, where σ is the surface charge density and v is the velocity. To calculate the current, the differential current element is expressed as dI = K dl, leading to dI = σ Rω dl. The discussion raises a question about the path for dl, with the professor indicating dl = R dθ, prompting confusion about why R is used instead of R sin(θ). The term "uniformly" in this context can imply different configurations of charge distribution, such as multiple wires wrapped around the shell. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing the current in the system.
izzmach
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Surface current density, K is defined as:
K = σv
where σ is surface charge density and v is velocity.

Given a uniformly charged spherical shell with radius R, spinning at constant angular velocity ω, find the current.

So, I start with this formula:
dI = K dl
dI = σ Rω dl
and I placed the spherical shell at cartesian coordinate with its center at origin and try to solve the question in spherical coordinate.

What path should I take to express dl? Professor explained, dl = R dθ. What I don't understand is, why do we have to take R? Why not R sin(θ)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
izzmach said:
Surface current density, K is defined as:
K = σv
where σ is surface charge density and v is velocity.

Given a uniformly charged spherical shell with radius R, spinning at constant angular velocity ω, find the current.

So, I start with this formula:
dI = K dl
dI = σ Rω dl
and I placed the spherical shell at cartesian coordinate with its center at origin and try to solve the question in spherical coordinate.

What path should I take to express dl? Professor explained, dl = R dθ. What I don't understand is, why do we have to take R? Why not R sin(θ)?

What might "uniformly" charged mean in this case? Imagine you had 10 wires wrapped round the upper hemisphere. You could do that "uniformly" in two different ways.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top