What Does It Mean for a Conductor to Be Grounded in Electrical Terms?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kini.Amith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    ground potential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of grounding in electrical terms, particularly focusing on its implications for conductors and the reference potential associated with grounded conductors. Participants explore theoretical scenarios involving grounded conductors, such as spherical shells and parallel plates, and the implications of grounding on charge flow and potential differences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of grounding, noting that while it generally implies a potential of zero, it raises questions about the reference potential, particularly in the context of grounded spherical shells and their relation to potential at infinity.
  • Another participant distinguishes between two uses of "ground": one as an arbitrary reference point in a circuit and the other as a physical connection to the Earth, suggesting that confusion may arise from these different contexts.
  • A participant expresses confusion over textbook problems involving grounded conductors, questioning whether grounding implies that the potential of a grounded conductor is equivalent to that at infinity.
  • One participant argues that if two conductors are both grounded, no charge would flow between them since they would have the same voltage, implying that current requires a voltage gradient.
  • Another participant cautions against assuming that the voltage is zero at infinity, stating that this assumption may not hold in all scenarios and can lead to incorrect conclusions if the voltage is constrained elsewhere.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of grounding and the assumptions surrounding reference potentials. There is no consensus on the interpretation of grounding in various contexts, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between grounded conductors and potential differences.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the implications of grounding, particularly regarding the assumptions about reference potentials and the conditions under which charge flow occurs. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and uncertainties related to grounding in electrical theory.

kini.Amith
Messages
83
Reaction score
1
What exactly does it mean when we say that a conductor is grounded? I know it generally means that its potential is zero, but shouldn't the description of potential also give the location of a reference potential?
For instance, if a conducting spherical shell is grounded, if its potential is zero, is at the same time the potential at infinity also zero?
I get even more confused with flat plates. For eg Consider this prob: "3 large conducting plates are placed parallel to each other. The 2 plates at the sides are grounded. If the charge on the central conductor is Q, how much charge flows from the ground to the 2 extreme end conductors?"
Here, where do we take the reference potential? How can we make use of the fact that 2 of the plates are grounded?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's possible that you are being misled by the two somewhat different uses of the term "ground". In a circuit, some point is taken as the reference point and called ground. That point is usually the negative terminal of the power source for the circuit. The other use is a reference to a point that is literally connected to the Earth and is called ground or said to be grounded. The first is an arbitrary (but generally reasonable) point in a circuit and the second is more specific. A circuit ground may or may not be connected to Earth ground.
 
phinds said:
It's possible that you are being misled by the two somewhat different uses of the term "ground".
But i keep finding these kinds of problems in many textbooks and exams. For instance, there are probs like 'consider 3 concentric metallic spherical shells. The inner shell carries a charge q, the outer shell carries a charge 2q, the middle shell is grounded. How much charge flows from the ground to the grounded conductor?" I know we'll get the answer if we assume the potential at infinity is zero and the potential of the middle shell is also zero. But this doesn't seem to be so obvious to me. Is the statement "the middle shell is grounded" equivalent to "the potential of the middle shell is the same as the potential at infinity "?
For parallel plates, if I'm not wrong, u can't take the potential at infinity to be 0, so I'm completely lost there. How would one, for instance, approach the problem that i posted i the original question.
Note that there are no electronic circuits anywhere and nothing whatsoever mentioned about the earthin these.
 
That question doesn't make sense to me. All grounds may as well be perfect electric conductors that are all connected to one another, so no charge would ever flow from one to another.

For charge to flow you need a current which means you need an electric field which is defined as a voltage gradient. If two conductors are both grounded then their voltage is the same so no current between them.
 
And you can't always assume that the voltage is 0 at infinity. It's a mathematically convenient assumption for a problem in which the voltage is under constrained. If the voltage is constrained somewhere then it's unnecessary and wrong to constrain it elsewhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K