What Does It Mean When We Define a Variable in Mathematics?

AI Thread Summary
Defining a variable in mathematics involves associating it with a specific type, such as real numbers or vectors, allowing for operations applicable to that type. For instance, when x is defined as a real variable, it can represent any real number, enabling standard mathematical operations like addition and multiplication. Similarly, functions like f(x) are treated as real numbers that can change, reinforcing the concept of variables. The discussion also touches on the equal sign "=", which can be interpreted as a substitution principle or as a binary relation with specific properties. Understanding these definitions and operations is crucial for mathematical syntax and set theory.
C0nfused
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
All these letters that we use in our calculations are mostly called variables,parameters or name of functions, which are actually variables too. So how do we define variables? For example when we say that x is a real variable what exactly do we mean? Is it a letter that represents any element of the set, so in my example any real number? So if we have defined the set that the variable takes "values" from, then we can apply any operation of this set to specific elements of the set combined with the variable?

To make it more clear, if x is a real variable then we can do all the usual operations to expressions/equations/inequalities etc that contain the letter/variable x? So x is actually a real number and any operation of real numbers can apply to it (example 2*x+3*x=(2+3)*x=5*x=5x) ? This also applies to real functions? I mean f(x) is actually a number ,that can change so it's called a variable, but it's still a real number?

Similar to this, if x is a vector then we can do any operations defined for vectors with x ?

That's all,
Thanks

P.S: Something quite irrelevant: What exactly the equal sign "=" means? When we say that a=b this means that a is exactly the same thing as b?What's the difference with the other sign that i don't know its name, which is similar to "=" but with three lines?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You're getting into formal logic. :smile: I think the best answer for you would be types...

A language has an assortment of type symbols, and a collection of variable symbols associated with each type.

So, for example, when we say "x is a real number", we mean that x is a variable symbol associated with the "real number" type.

The syntax of mathematics would then specify the types of various strings of symbols. For example, if:

f is of the "functions from R to R" type,
x is of the "real number" type,
Then,
the string of symbols f(x) is of the "real number" type.



One of the good points about set theory is that it's good at modelling this sort of language. So, each type corresponds to some set. E.G. there's a set of real numbers, and a set of functions from R to R. The string of symbols "f(x)" is interpreted as the evaluation of f at x.



There are a couple of ways to interpret the "=" symbol. One way is that if "a = b", then you can substitute b in for a in any formula. Another way is that "=" is simply another binary relation that satisfies some properties.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top