What Does Modulus of Negative Numbers Mean in DFT Symmetry?

EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
One of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) properties (symmetry property) is that:

x^*[-n]_N \stackrel{DFT}{\leftrightarrow}X^*[k]

where * means conjugate, and [.]_N means modulus N. What is the meaning of modulus of negative numbers?

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
S_David said:
One of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) properties (symmetry property) is that:

x^*[-n]_N \stackrel{DFT}{\leftrightarrow}X^*[k]

where * means conjugate, and [.]_N means modulus N. What is the meaning of modulus of negative numbers?

Thanks in advance

Hey S_David.

When you say modulus do you mean the standard definition found in whole number arithmetic?

If this is the case, then the normal definition applies. Basically it is the lowest remainder given dimension of some number by a whole number N.

For negative numbers, this means that you have to start from a multiple that is less than or equal to a multiple of N.

So let's say we have a number -8 and our modulus argument is 9, then the answer is going to be 1 since -9 is a factor of 9 and one more than -9 is -8. Basically we apply the same decomposition theorem of n = pq + r where r is the modulo result, n is our input to decompose and q is your 'N' in this case and p is a whole number which in the negative case is a negative number.

Is this what you are wondering about? I get a feeling it may not be since you are asking about things in the context of Fourier transforms.
 
Yeah, I asked for standard definition. May be there is a physical meaning in DFT, but I wanted to know about the negative numbers in general.

Thanks
 
A negative number, x, mod n, is defined in exactly the same way as for a positive number: write x= mn+ r where 0\le r< n. Then the modulus is r.

For example, to find "-18 mod 5", I note that 3(5)= 15< 18< 20= 4(5). That is -18= -20+ 2 so "-18 mod 5" is 2.

Notice that to find "18 mod 5", I would start the same but write 18= 15+ 3 so "18 mod 5" is 3. It is the fact that r must be non-negative that is key.

Of course. 2+ 3= 5= 0 mod 5. Since -18 and 18 are "additive inverses", so must they be "mod 5".

So another way to find "-x mod n" is to find "x mod n" and subtract that from n.
 
Thanks HallsofIvy, that helped a lot.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top