What does Poynting Theorem reveal about electrodynamic losses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Poynting Theorem reveals that electrodynamic losses are primarily due to conductive losses, represented by the term \(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{J} = \sigma E^2\). However, the discussion highlights that the theorem encompasses more complex interactions, including energy loss through work done on charges and electromagnetic radiation. By manipulating the theorem's equation, it becomes clear that total field energy decreases due to these interactions. The Poynting vector describes energy flux across surfaces, indicating that energy can be lost even without traditional radiated waves. Overall, Poynting Theorem serves as a conservation principle for electromagnetic work and energy.
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
Poynting Theorem stated:

\vec E \cdot \vec J = - \frac 1 2 \frac {\partial} {\partial t} ( \epsilon E^2 + \frac 1 {\mu} B^2) - \frac 1 {\mu} \nabla \cdot( \vec E \times \vec B)

In pure electrodynamic point of view,

\vec E \cdot \vec J = \sigma E^2 which is nothing more than conductive loss ( resistance ohmic loss).

But I have a suspicion that is more to it than this...nothing is that simple. Please tell me what I missed.

Thanks

Alan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's precisely what it is! Perhaps it's easiest to grasp by bringig the first term of the right-hand side of your equation to the left and the EJ term to the right and integrate the whole expression over a finite volume.

From Noether's theorem you know that

\mathcal{E}=\frac{1}{2} (\vec{E} \cdot \vec{D}+\vec{B} \cdot \vec{H})

is the energy density of the electromagnetic field (including polarization and magnetization effects of the bound charges/magnetic dipoles in the medium).

The Poynting vector,

\vec{S}=\vec{E} \times \vec{H}

is the energy flux. So manipulating your equation in the way indicated above, you get

\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} E_{\text{field}}=-\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \vec{J} \cdot \vec{E} - \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{S}.

For the term with the Poynting vector, I've used Gauß's integral law. This equation means that the total field energy gets lost by the work done, i.e., to the motion of the charges, upon which the em. field acts and by radiation of em. waves, which transports energy through the surface of the volume under consideration.
 
Thanks, that make me feel a lot better.
 
Yes, the Poynting Theorem is really the electrodynamic work-energy conservation theorem. If the total energy contained in the electromagnetic fields decreases over time it must be because the fields did work on charges and created currents, or because the energy simply flowed out of the volume of interest.

Technically, the Poynting vector just describes energy crossing a surface, which can happen even if we don't have traditional radiated waves.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top