What does quantities and dimensions mean?

AI Thread Summary
Quantities refer to measurable attributes like velocity or force, while dimensions represent the nature of these quantities, such as length. Different units can express the same dimension, meaning two quantities can share the same dimension but differ in units. For example, height can be measured in inches or centimeters, illustrating that the dimension remains constant despite unit variation. The discussion clarifies the distinction between quantities and dimensions, emphasizing their relationship in measurement. Understanding this concept is essential for accurate communication in scientific contexts.
elton_fan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
i would like to ask a question about what does quantities and dimension mean in this sentence
is it possible for two quantities to have the same dimensions but different units?

thanks a lot in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
elton_fan said:
i would like to ask a question about what does quantities and dimension mean in this sentence
is it possible for two quantities to have the same dimensions but different units?

thanks a lot in advance


A physical quantity is something that can be measured, for example, velocity, force, etc. The quantity is expressed in units, which are not to be confused with the term 'dimension'. The term 'dimension' needn't be used, actually.
 
"Length" is an example of a dimension. The "meter" is an example of a unit, one that can be used to express lengths.

- Warren
 
so for example what would be the answer of this question?
i think it's yes
it's true
 
Last edited:
elton_fan said:
so for example what would be the answer of this question?

I'll answer your question with a question. How tall are you in inches? How tall are you in centimeters? Your height dimension is the same, no matter what units you use to express that height.

Think of a particular shipping box. It has linear dimensions of length, width and height. And those dimensions can be measured using various unit systems.
 
thanks a lot i understand now
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top