What Does R^m -> R^n Mean in Notation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astrum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Astrum
Messages
269
Reaction score
5
Notation question - R^m ---> r^n

I've come across this notation a lot lately. I'm not sure what it really means.

R^{m} \rightarrow R^{n}

I can't find the place in my book where it explains it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means a function from the space Rm to the space Rn.

Rm is the m dimensional real vector space, or sometimes more concretely the space

{(x1, ..., xm) | xi in ℝ}
 
Hm, so you mean turning a vector in R3 to R4 as a concrete example?
 
Yep.
 
We can write
\begin{align}
f:\mathbb{R}^m&\to\mathbb{R}^n\\
x&\mapsto y=f(x)
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
y&=(y_1,\dots,y_n)\\
&=f(x)\\
&=f(x_1,\dots,x_m)\\
&=(f_1(x),\dots,f_n(x))\\
&=(f_1(x_1,\dots,x_m),\dots,f_n(x_1,\dots,x_m)).
\end{align}
Try drawing the graphs of the functions
\begin{align}
f:\mathbb{R}^2&\to\mathbb{R}\\
(x,y)&\mapsto z=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
f:\mathbb{R}&\to\mathbb{R}^2\\
x&\mapsto (y,z)=(\cos x,\sin x).
\end{align}
The graph associated with the map f:A\to B is denoted \Gamma_f and is a subset of the product space A\times B.

Linear algebra considers the case that f is linear.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top