Solving sec^-1 in Horizontal Displacement Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter gskroger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the meaning of the values (beta) = 0.1 sec^-1 and (omega) = 0.05 sec^-1 in the context of a horizontal displacement equation for damped oscillating objects. Participants clarify that "sec" represents seconds, and the notation sec^-1 indicates a frequency measurement, specifically angular rate in radians per second. There is a distinction made between sec^-1 and Hz, with the former being angular frequency and the latter representing cycles per second, differing by a factor of 2π. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting these units to ensure accurate calculations in applications like Excel. Overall, understanding these units is crucial for solving the given equation accurately.
gskroger
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've got a problem where I'm given some variables that I don't understand the value of. The formula is for horizontal displacement of damped oscillating objects. The values I'm not understanding are:

(beta) = 0.1 sec^-1
(omega) = .05 sec ^-1

What does sec represent? seconds? secant?

I thought maybe it was .1 seconds raised to the negative 1 power, but the graph I get doesn't match the answer. I'm trying to put the formula into an excel spreadsheet. The full equation is:

x=x(naught)e^(-beta*time)*[cos(omega*time)+(beta/omega)sin(omega*time)]

I would appreciate any help on this.

Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general

x^{-1} = 1/x

In particular,

\mathrm{sec}^{-1} = 1 / \mathrm{sec} = \mathrm{Hz}

(yes, sec = seconds)
 
As Hurkyl said, it is seconds

Ask yourself this, if it was secant...then wouldn't there have to be a following value?? or are you going to take a secant of nothing?
 
Thanks, Hurkyl!
 
Just a technical point to avoid confusion: Both sec^-1 and Hz are used to denote frequency. However, by convention, Hz stands for cycles per second and sec^-1 is the angular rate (radians per second): they differ by a factor of 2\pi. In particular,

2\pi\mbox{ sec}^{-1}=1\mbox{ Hz}

Edit: corrected as per NateTG post.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by krab
Just a technical point to avoid confusion: Both sec^-1 and Hz are used to denote frequency. However, by convention, Hz stands for cycles per second and sec^-1 is the angular rate (radians per second): they differ by a factor of 2\pi. In particular,

1\mbox{ sec}^{-1}=2\pi\mbox{ Hz}

Don't you mean 2\pi s^{-1}=1 \mbox{Hz}? 1 Hertz is a cycle per second which is 2\pi(radians) per second.

I usually think of s^{-1} as being a unit of angular velocity, and Hz as a unit of frequency.

Of course, since 2\pi is unitless, there can be multiple definitions of s^{-1}.

P.S. s^{-1} is often read as 'per second.'
 
Originally posted by NateTG
Don't you mean 2\pi s^{-1}=1 \mbox{Hz}?
Sorry. My bad. I'll fix it (like revising the congressional record). I'll attribute it to you so it's clear why you corrected it.
 
Back
Top