I What does the multiplication of matrix represents?

parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19
As we know that 2×3 = 2+2+2 = 6;
so similarly what does matrix multiplication represents?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
parshyaa said:
As we know that 2×3 = 2+2+2 = 6;
so similarly what does matrix multiplication represents?
It means the consecutive application of two linear transformations represented by the matrices.
 
  • Like
Likes parshyaa
Here's another explanation. A matrix can be thought of as a kind of function, one that takes a vector as its input, and produces another vector as its output. Multiplication of two matrices is equivalent to the composition of the functions that are represented by the matrices. I've explained this in terms of functions, but the usual terminology is linear transformations, mappings between vectors in one space to vectors in possibly a different space.
 
  • Like
Likes parshyaa
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top