What Does the Notation l.l Represent in Norm Contexts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gauss mouse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Notation
gauss mouse
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
If you look here http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/RiezsLemma.html , there seems to be something missing - nothing is said about the norm of (x_alpha) or about the norm of (s - x_alpha).

Now, the same thing seems to happen here http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/CompactnessOfClosedUnitBallInNormedSpaces.html , so I guess there's something about the notation that I'm not getting, rather than there being something actually missing.

Can anyone help? To be honest, I fail to see how "lx_alphal and ls-x_alphal for every s in S" could be a statement.

NB: The notation l.l is used to denote norm on the quoted webpages, rather than the more usual ll.ll
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
(Riesz Lemma). Fix 0 < \alpha < 1. If S\subset E is a proper closed subspace of a
Banach space E then one can find x_{\alpha} \in X with ||x_{\alpha}|| = 1 and |s - x| \geq  \alpha, for all s \in S
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top