What does the `|' represent in an infinite product notation?

blankvin
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Hi,
In my QFT course, the professor writes an infinite product like this:

n | k n0 > 0 ∫...

My question is, what does the `|' in the subscript "n | k" representing? When I see `|', I think logical OR - obviously that is not it. Normally, if it's a sum over two indices, commas separate the indices - not sure if `|' in place of a comma is standard notation or not.

Any ideas?Thanks,
blankvin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a constitution of a ket
 
In math when you write ## n|k ## it means that exist ## c ## such that ## k=c\cdot n ##, in other words is the product over all divisors of ##k## ..., I don't know otherwise ...
 
  • Like
Likes blankvin
Thinking back to my complex analysis course, I think the bar `|' represents "such that", or "where". So,

n | kn0>0

can be read as "an infinite product over n, where kn0 is greater than zero". This also became a little more clear once I picked up Peskin and Schroeder, and looked at Ch9.2.
 
Ssnow said:
In math when you write ## n|k ## it means that exist ## c ## such that ## k=c\cdot n ##, in other words is the product over all divisors of ##k## ..., I don't know otherwise ...

Yes, that's it. See P&S, p.285-286: k is defined as a constant times n. This makes sense.Thanks,
blankvin.
 
  • Like
Likes Ssnow
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top