nonequilibrium
- 1,412
- 2
It's used in a certain proof that I'm reading. A is a linear map from a vectorspace V onto itself.
They say they can rewrite the vector space as \mathcal V = \bigoplus_\mu \mathbb C^{m_\mu} \otimes \mathcal V^\mu and I understand this, but they then claim one can (always, as any linear map) rewrite A as A = [A^{\mu \nu}]_{\mu \nu} "where A^{\mu \nu} is a linear map of \mathbb C^{m_\nu} \otimes \mathcal V^\nu to \mathbb C^{m_\mu} \otimes \mathcal V^\mu."
I don't understand the nature of this decomposition/rewriting. Note that this rewriting has to be possible for any A, it doesn't use any special properties of A (that comes later in the proof).
They say they can rewrite the vector space as \mathcal V = \bigoplus_\mu \mathbb C^{m_\mu} \otimes \mathcal V^\mu and I understand this, but they then claim one can (always, as any linear map) rewrite A as A = [A^{\mu \nu}]_{\mu \nu} "where A^{\mu \nu} is a linear map of \mathbb C^{m_\nu} \otimes \mathcal V^\nu to \mathbb C^{m_\mu} \otimes \mathcal V^\mu."
I don't understand the nature of this decomposition/rewriting. Note that this rewriting has to be possible for any A, it doesn't use any special properties of A (that comes later in the proof).