What is the meaning of := in mathematical notation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BustedBreaks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Notation
AI Thread Summary
The notation "u := -v" indicates that u is defined to be the negative of v, where v has been previously established. This use of ":=" is common in mathematical contexts to clarify definitions. It is often encountered in advanced topics, such as Fourier Transforms, where precise variable definitions are crucial. Additionally, software like MathCad utilizes this notation for defining variables and functions. Overall, ":=" serves as a clear way to communicate the relationship between variables in mathematical expressions.
BustedBreaks
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
u := -v

specifically the " := "

Here is the context. When f, g are suitably regular functions on R we can use the change of variable u:=-v etc..I should add that I came across this in a Fourier Transform book..

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It usually means 'defined to be'.

So in this context, we know what v is, and we want to define u as a new variable. So you write u := -v to let the reader know u is being defined as -v (where v has been defined previously).
 
Ah... well that makes sense
thank you very much.
 
What, you haven't learned all half-dozen (dozen?) different symbols for "defined as" yet? :p
 
the program MathCad uses the ":=" to define things like variables and functions. perhaps you saw a document made with mathcad?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top