What drives a polymath's insatiable curiosity and love for scientific method?

In summary, a polymath's insatiable curiosity and love for scientific method is driven by their innate desire for knowledge and understanding. They possess a broad range of interests and constantly seek out new information and experiences to satisfy their intellectual curiosity. The scientific method, with its emphasis on systematic observation, experimentation, and logical reasoning, appeals to their analytical and inquisitive nature. This drive for knowledge and understanding fuels their passion for learning and fuels their pursuit of diverse fields of study. Ultimately, the combination of curiosity and scientific method enables polymaths to make unique and valuable contributions to society.
  • #1
Steve Kane
I am a total geek, that is to say I am totally and obsessively interested in absolutely everything that might submit to scientific method, and a few wild cards (penny shares?), that I keep an eye on. And always have been, for sixty years now.

Not being an idiot two things excite me most,

1) a credible item that seems to overturn my most cherised assumptions,

2) where some esoteric insight within a very obscure discipline that "nobody outside it" could ever get, is remarkably similar to something far away in a similarly deep silo.

Lobbing it from one silo into the other and standing back, can be fun.
I have yet to decide whether not having a .ac address, which means 90% of my communications go unread is a disability, or just an efficient triage device.

I talk and write too much, that's joy for you. Sometimes I produce word salad, that's an artifact of my ancient keyboard, after a few beers I don't notice its spontaneous dances around the text. in time to correct them.

Some days I wake up female, some days I wake up male, sometimes I am a cockroach of undefined gender, politics or sexual orientation, but never do I wake up a fan of Deepak Chopra, nor of "excessive certainty".

I study "religion" also. My last experiment was to induce the profound euphoria that seven years of buddhist meditation many years ago made easy, it is pretty much exactly like the joy of music, nature or a game well played, I took a minute dose of antipsychotic and it went away. Like I thought, it is an entirely chemo-neurological event. More spectacular nirvana like experiences, on careful deconstruction, are frontal lobe epilepsy, being bipolar, and having it under constant inspection, hence minimum concrete manifestation, I am not surprised. So I have yet to come across a supposedly spiritual experience that I could not prove to my satisfaction to be hormonal, neurological, psychotic, or similar. Believe me, I have gone deep within them.

I am still looking in the bottom of my crucible at the residue, trying new solvents and catalysts to see if the thin scum, now almost a perfectly reflective nanoparticle coating, will evaporate too.
I have an uncomportably exiting feeling, that beneath the modern strata lies an ancient sketch of the human condition, highly adaptive in paleolithic times, only useful now if "recontexed".

Please take the piss, I will. It's the only way we will think new thought never before thunk.
My spellchecker is stuck on Portuguese, so it marks almost everything as wrong, which is suitably chastening.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Aufbauwerk 2045 and ISamson
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Thank you Greg, I promise not to be boring, off topic, off my head, but if I'm tedious one may troll me hard for my own good.
 
  • #4
Hi. I'm a know-it-all (sorry I mean polymath) also, and like you I try to understand everything rationally, in particular religion. Also I tend to be verbose and opinionated at times. So I look forward to your posts. :)

Steve Kane said:
I am a total geek, that is to say I am totally and obsessively interested in absolutely everything that might submit to scientific method, and a few wild cards (penny shares?), that I keep an eye on. And always have been, for sixty years now.

Not being an idiot two things excite me most,

1) a credible item that seems to overturn my most cherised assumptions,

2) where some esoteric insight within a very obscure discipline that "nobody outside it" could ever get, is remarkably similar to something far away in a similarly deep silo.

Lobbing it from one silo into the other and standing back, can be fun.
I have yet to decide whether not having a .ac address, which means 90% of my communications go unread is a disability, or just an efficient triage device.

I talk and write too much, that's joy for you. Sometimes I produce word salad, that's an artifact of my ancient keyboard, after a few beers I don't notice its spontaneous dances around the text. in time to correct them.

Some days I wake up female, some days I wake up male, sometimes I am a cockroach of undefined gender, politics or sexual orientation, but never do I wake up a fan of Deepak Chopra, nor of "excessive certainty".

I study "religion" also. My last experiment was to induce the profound euphoria that seven years of buddhist meditation many years ago made easy, it is pretty much exactly like the joy of music, nature or a game well played, I took a minute dose of antipsychotic and it went away. Like I thought, it is an entirely chemo-neurological event. More spectacular nirvana like experiences, on careful deconstruction, are frontal lobe epilepsy, being bipolar, and having it under constant inspection, hence minimum concrete manifestation, I am not surprised. So I have yet to come across a supposedly spiritual experience that I could not prove to my satisfaction to be hormonal, neurological, psychotic, or similar. Believe me, I have gone deep within them.

I am still looking in the bottom of my crucible at the residue, trying new solvents and catalysts to see if the thin scum, now almost a perfectly reflective nanoparticle coating, will evaporate too.
I have an uncomportably exiting feeling, that beneath the modern strata lies an ancient sketch of the human condition, highly adaptive in paleolithic times, only useful now if "recontexed".

Please take the piss, I will. It's the only way we will think new thought never before thunk.
My spellchecker is stuck on Portuguese, so it marks almost everything as wrong, which is suitably chastening.
 
  • #5
See my one and only, today, having to count to ten to avoid being seriously sarcastic. Supper time approaches, I try never to do this kind of thing afterwards, it is not good for my sleep. Unless the quality of debate improves a lot, I may not bother again.
 
  • #6
PS nice to meet you, thanks for the comment.
 
  • #7
Steve Kane said:
PS nice to meet you, thanks for the comment.
Please use the "edit" button when you need to add something to a post instead of making several small posts in a row, I see you've done the same thing in your other thread, just a helpful hint. :smile:
 
  • #8
I think I thought of that, but the whole experience of total lack of curiosity and vast certainty at first contact, brought upon me the realisation that pehaps I couldn't be bothered.
Thank you anyway.
"People will never forget how you made them feel". So true.
 

1. What is a polymath?

A polymath is a person who has expertise in multiple fields of study, often including both the arts and sciences. They are known for their broad range of knowledge and curiosity in various subjects.

2. Why are polymaths so curious?

Polymaths have an insatiable curiosity because they are constantly seeking out new knowledge and experiences. They have a deep desire to understand the world around them and are driven by a thirst for knowledge.

3. What drives a polymath's love for scientific method?

A polymath's love for scientific method is driven by their need for structure and organization in their pursuit of knowledge. The scientific method provides a systematic approach to understanding and solving problems, which appeals to the logical and analytical minds of polymaths.

4. How does a polymath balance multiple interests and fields of study?

A polymath is able to balance multiple interests and fields of study by being highly organized and efficient with their time. They also have a natural ability to see connections and patterns between seemingly unrelated subjects, allowing them to integrate their knowledge and make connections between different fields.

5. Can anyone become a polymath?

While anyone can develop a broad range of knowledge and interests, it takes a unique combination of intelligence, curiosity, and dedication to become a true polymath. It also requires a lot of hard work and a willingness to constantly learn and expand one's knowledge base.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
100
Replies
1
Views
325
Replies
4
Views
69
Replies
2
Views
61
Replies
6
Views
717
Replies
4
Views
571
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
2
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top