What effect would accelerated electrons have in the air?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 656954
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Electrons
AI Thread Summary
Accelerated electrons in the air can generate harmful effects, including X-rays with photon energies up to 1 MeV, which poses safety concerns for individuals nearby. The discussion likens the behavior of accelerated electrons to lightning, indicating that once breakdown occurs, controlling their path becomes nearly impossible. The concept of using a device to direct electrons is challenged, suggesting it may function more like a Van de Graaff generator, resulting in unpredictable discharges. Additionally, the mention of a circular rug designed to absorb electrons raises questions about its effectiveness in grounding them. Overall, the potential dangers of using accelerated electrons in a fictional context are highlighted, emphasizing the need for caution in their portrayal.
member 656954
I've been reading about semiconductor laser-driven particle accelerators over the years, and think they would make an interesting future-tech privacy screen...possibly. My design is along the lines illustrated by the diagram, but I'm wondering what actual effect accelerated electrons would have in the air. A quick search suggests nothing good, though, with generation of "X‐rays with photon energies up to 1 MeV" as an example.

Given this is sci-fi, I'm happy to apply artistic license, but if the people within are going to electrocuted, or sheeted with X-rays, then that might be a plot device carried too far :nb)

PrivacyCurtainConcept.png


(In my story I've also a circular rug that absorbs (grounds?) the electrons.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tghu Verd said:
but I'm wondering what actual effect accelerated electrons would have in the air

That's pretty much what lightning is.
 
  • Haha
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Vanadium 50 said:
That's pretty much what lightning is.

Thanks @Vanadium 50, that's what I hoped would not be the obvious answer. Which suggests it's not possible to 'shepherd' electrons to the ground in the directed way I imagined. Instead, my device would probably be more like a Van de Graaff generator, spitting off random discharges all over the place :biggrin:
 
I'm afraid once you have breakdown, you're not going to have any control over where the electrons go. They will find their own way. As for x-rays, you get them from lightning too.

Shazam!
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
Check out the band Arc Attack. They do cover songs using Tesla coils, Faraday cages, and robots.
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...
Back
Top