What exactly is an oscillator in quantum physical context?

Masna
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've recently purchased a book on Quantum Physics, and I'm trying to get the basics down. At this point in time, I'm reading up on how Planck proposed that oscillators can only oscillate at discrete energies as opposed to on any amount of energy (on a theoretical continuous spectrum). This came up in his attempt (and success) to solve the black body radiation "problem." However, I don't exactly understand what "oscillator" means in this context. I understand that to oscillate is to move uniformly back and forth (so to speak) over a center point. But I'm confused as to why the word oscillator is used here.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All it is is a particle in a potential well of U(x) = 1/2 kx^2 (in the one dimensional case).
 
Monocles said:
All it is is a particle in a potential well of U(x) = 1/2 kx^2 (in the one dimensional case).

I'm not sure I understand this.
 
Well, a classical harmonic oscillator that follows Hooke's law of F = -kx has a potential energy of U(x) = 1/2 kx^2. A quantum harmonic oscillator has the same potential energy equation as a classical harmonic oscillator.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top