What Exists Beyond the Reach of the First Photon in the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hypotemoose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of light and space following the Big Bang, particularly regarding the first photon and the concept of "dark" areas in the universe. It clarifies that the universe was initially filled with hot particles and radiation, leaving no empty space at the time of the Big Bang. The concept of light traveling at the speed of light (c) is explored, emphasizing that while nothing can exceed c locally, galaxies can recede faster than c due to cosmic expansion. The idea that the universe is expanding into something else is debunked; instead, space itself is not being created anew. Finally, it is noted that for the first 380,000 years post-Big Bang, light could not travel freely due to dense plasma, resulting in a lack of visibility in the early universe.
hypotemoose
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Dark "corner" of the universe

Hi all,

So I'm reading about special relativity and "c" and, go figure, I have a couple questions. But here's my first, most basic question. Forgive me for confusion of terms and noob questions.

I don't know "when" light was created (at BB or much later), but let's say that - if I can - that the very first photon, Photon Bob, started traveling at 'c' at 'second 0' and that we're in the vacuum of our universe without any gravity to bother us.

Apparently, light (this photon) travels at 'c' - 299,792, 458 metres/second. So, at Start time (Second 0), location of Photon Bob is at x 0, y 0 And it is traveling solely in the direction of y. So at End time (Second 1), Photon Bob is at X 0, Y 299,792,458 metres.

My question then, is WHAT, at that exact instant, Second 1, is at 299, 792, 459 metres? More space - space where light hasn't reached yet?


Sorry, I have no familiarity with physics/math notations to have made this shorter. But I really appreciate the help!

- Hypo
 
Space news on Phys.org


The big bang occurred everywhere in the universe at the same time. The very early universe was filled with an extremely hot bath of hot particles and radiation, annihilating with themselves to make more particles and radiation over and over again. The key thing to understand is that there was no "empty space" anywhere in the universe at this time. The entirety of the universe was filled like this.
 


Thanks!

I'm confused b/c I'm reading "The God Problem" by Howard Bloom and he translates into layman's terms one of Einstein's findings that 'c' is a universal "speed limit" - nothing exceeds c.

But if speed is measured by distance/time, what is the location at which anything traveling at c will be located 1 unit of time later if it's already at the "sidelines/edge" of the universe and heading "out of bounds"?

However, it sounds like you're saying that, apart from black holes, there is no part of the universe that is "dark", including the expanded areas that weren't there when the universe was smaller?

Sorry, this is confusing stuff! Appreciate the help!
 


hypotemoose said:
I'm confused b/c I'm reading "The God Problem" by Howard Bloom and he translates into layman's terms one of Einstein's findings that 'c' is a universal "speed limit" - nothing exceeds c.

That's actually not true. The speed limit c is only for local areas of space where you can apply Special Relativity. General Relativity has no such limit and it is this fact which allows for galaxies to recede from us at a velocity greater than c due to cosmological expansion.

But if speed is measured by distance/time, what is the location at which anything traveling at c will be located 1 unit of time later if it's already at the "sidelines/edge" of the universe and heading "out of bounds"?

However, it sounds like you're saying that, apart from black holes, there is no part of the universe that is "dark", including the expanded areas that weren't there when the universe was smaller?

I'm saying that there isn't any "expanded areas" of the universe that wasn't there prior. That whole idea is incorrect. The universe is not expanding into anything else. Space is not being created where no space was before. Everything in the universe simply gets further away from everything else unless bound by gravity or another fundamental force like electromagnetism.

See the FAQ threads in this forum.
 


Very interesting. Appreciate it, Drakkith!
 


When you see descriptions about the big bang [BB]occurring at some 'point', they are referring to the observable universe, not the total cosmos. [I just saw an illustration in Wikipedia a few days ago, cannot find it now..]

'Dark' likely refers to the fact that until about 380,000 years after the BB no light could get through the initial charged plasma...photons [particles] of light were absorbed. So we could not 'see' anything had we been there.

At the BB and until some 380,000 years later, things were initially really dense...and very different from today...so much so that at the BB itself nobody knows exactly what was there...nor where it came from...our models actually start just moments after the initial bang.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top