What factors affect the age of the universe?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how general relativity affects the perception of time near massive bodies, leading to the question of how to determine the universe's age of 13.72 billion years. It is argued that time runs differently for various objects in the universe, particularly near black holes, which could suggest that different observers experience different ages of the universe. To establish a meaningful age, it is proposed to consider an upper limit based on empty space away from gravitational sources and a lower limit near massive black holes. However, the differences in perceived age are negligible for most of the universe, as they primarily affect regions close to black holes and neutron stars. Overall, while time dilation is significant near these massive objects, it does not fundamentally alter the established age of the universe for most observers.
anubodh
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Acc. to general relativity time runs slowly near a massive body.So, i have a question bothering me from some time that if time for every body/object in universe runs at a different rate then how can we determine the age of universe i.e. 13.72 billion years.
Near a black hole as time runs slowly, age of universe would be much much less.Infact,ever body/object in universe would have different age of universe acc. to it.
And if we really want to calculate universe present age we should put a upper limit to it's age by determining the time passed in empty space from big bang which is away from gravitational source (as time passes the fastest here) and a lower limit by the oldest and massive black hole in universe as time there would have passed the least i.e. the age of universe from it's point of view would be even less than 0.5 billion years.
Hope,i am right!
 
Space news on Phys.org
Every position in space will see a different age of the universe. However, the difference is negligible* for all the universe except the direct vicinity of black holes and neutron stars. We are not in those regions, so we can measure a meaningful value for the age of the universe.

*some orders of magnitude below the current experimental uncertainties

Such a lower limit would not exist by the way, you can slow time as much as you like close to black holes.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top