What Factors Affect the Natural Frequency of a Wineglass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 06mangro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance
AI Thread Summary
The natural frequency of a wineglass is primarily influenced by its density, shape, and thickness. Length plays a crucial role, as it determines the standing wave patterns and the number of nodes that can form. The formula f = nv/4L illustrates this relationship, where n represents the harmonic number, L is the length, and v is the wave velocity. As objects increase in size or complexity, the factors affecting their natural frequency become more intricate, especially with multiple materials involved. Understanding these principles is essential for analyzing the vibrational characteristics of various objects.
06mangro
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was just wondering what the natural frequency (of a wineglass) depends on,


i would say density of the glass, the shape, thickness,

could anyone tell me about in more detail?

Does this apply for any object (as the object gets bigger it becomes more complicated and especially if it has more than one material making it up?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
06mangro said:
Hello,

I was just wondering what the natural frequency (of a wineglass) depends on,


i would say density of the glass, the shape, thickness,

could anyone tell me about in more detail?

Does this apply for any object (as the object gets bigger it becomes more complicated and especially if it has more than one material making it up?)

The length will affect it more than anything; the standing wave that occupies it is determined in large by the length, as this affects the number of nodes that can form..

f=\frac{nv}{4L}
n = harmonic [where you can only have odd harmonics [1, 3, 5, etc].]
L = length.
v = velocity of the wave.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top