What factors affect the thermal conductivity of solids?

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi all

Am I correct to say that - in general - the thermal conductivity of metals is higher than that of semiconductors, because metals have more free electrons to help conduct the heat?

And is it correct that phonon-contribution to heat conductivy is more or less the same for all solids, regardless of the solid being an insulator, semiconductor or metal?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The phonon contribution to thermal conductivity can definitely vary. IIRC the relation involves the group velocity of the phonons which is usually quite large in systems with light atoms like beryllium oxide or strong bonds like diamond. Carbon is a good example of how changes in phonon and electronic structure change the thermal conductivity. Diamond (insulating carbon) is about 2000, but graphite (conducting carbon) is about 50-250.

The general trend that you mention is true; electrons often dominate the thermal conductivity, which you notice from the table if you ignore the few exceptional insulating materials. But it's good to remember that there are some interesting exceptions.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top