What factors determine the potential difference in a battery cell?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the factors that determine the potential difference in a battery cell, specifically questioning the mechanisms behind electron flow in electrochemical cells. The user expresses dissatisfaction with traditional explanations, seeking a qualitative understanding of the properties that create a potential gradient between half cells. They emphasize the need to identify a relative difference in qualities of the half cells that leads to spontaneous electron flow, rather than accepting that it simply becomes "lower in energy." The conversation touches on the relationship between Gibbs energy change and cell potential, highlighting the complexity of explaining why certain ions are favored. Ultimately, the discussion underscores the challenge of bridging chemistry and physics in understanding electrochemical processes.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
i first formally learned about the cell in my chemistry class. their explanations for how it works was very unsatisfactory for me; so i wondered if this was rather a physics question.

i have two half cells connected by a conductor (between the plates) and a salt bridge. i ask people why is there a flow of electrons in one particular direction and they keep telling me that "it's lower in energy to do so" but this doesn't explain ANYTHING about the mechanisms, ie the processes behind WHY it makes it lower in energy... all that statement does is that it provides me with a picture of a potential gradient which i am already aware of, because.. obviously if the electrons have a net direction then there MUST be a potential gradient. so that is obvious, but I'm interested in the process behind all of this that is responsible for setting up the potential gradient.


Cu(s)|Ag(aq)||Ag+(aq)|Ag(s)


this is the cell we've worked with in class. i don't understand why there exists a potential between two half cells.
basically what I'm looking for is, what property/quality of each half cell when considering them separately, is relatively high or relatively low when compared to the other half cell? there MUST exist a relative difference in something when considering them separately s.t when connecting them, they don't magically just "become lower in energy" to go in one particular direction; which is what the chem people were telling me. they keep saying that it's pointless considering them separately and that i had to consider them only when the two half cells were hooked up together.

so, what is this property/quality i am looking for?

i say quality because I'm looking for a qualitative description. I'm not looking for specific quantitatives.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thermodynamically, the Gibbs energy change in the net process ##Cu+2Ag^{+} \rightarrow Cu^{2+}+2Ag## is negative, which makes the process spontaneous and drives the flow of electrons. The Gibbs energy change can be related to the cell potential with the equation

##\Delta G^{0}=NFE^{0}_{cell}##

Explaining why it's favorable in terms of Gibbs energy to have a ##Cu^{2+}## ion in solution rather than an ##Ag^{+}## ion would be a really complicated quantum chemical and statistical mechanical problem, so you just have to accept the electrochemical series as it is given.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top