What fields in particle astrophysics need computationalists?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the intersection of computational astrophysics and particle astrophysics, particularly focusing on the desire for a career that emphasizes computational and theoretical work rather than observational astronomy. The individual expresses a strong interest in numerical simulations and is exploring fields that require computational expertise, specifically in particle astrophysics and quantum chromodynamics (QCD). There is a concern about the competitiveness of Ph.D. programs and job prospects in these areas, with a preference for fields that are less saturated. The conversation highlights the active nature of research in QCD and the potential overlap with condensed matter physics, suggesting that lattice gauge theories could provide opportunities in both domains. The distinction between particle astrophysics and high-energy astrophysics is also examined, with examples like dark matter research indicating the relevance of computational methods in these fields. Overall, the discussion seeks clarity on the landscape of particle astrophysics and its computational opportunities.
hadsed
Messages
492
Reaction score
2
Two main questions here that google can't really help me with. Right now I do research in computational astrophysics (n-body simulations) and I think I like doing numerical simulations (I'm a pretty good programmer and I like to apply that to physics). I'm somewhat interested in particle physics, though I'm interested in particle astrophysics since I like astrophysics as well. I really wouldn't like to get into a field where there's fierce competition even for getting into Ph.D programs, let alone get jobs in them (not that I can't handle it, but why kill yourself when you can do something else that interests you?).

Anyway, I try looking up some particle astrophysics groups but I see a lot of observational stuff. To be honest, observational astronomy really isn't interesting to me at all, I really only care about the computational/theoretical physics. What fields are there in particle astrophysics that need computationalists?

Also, I'm interested in QCD because I read about lattice gauge theories and related stuff and it seems like a really interesting and highly computational field that I'd like to get into.How active is this area of research? Does it fall under some bigger category in particle physics (like CFT or something)? Is it just as competitive/impossible-to-get-into as other areas in particle physics? And just for good measure, are there any other fields in particle physics that are heavily computational?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hadsed said:
I really wouldn't like to get into a field where there's fierce competition even for getting into Ph.D programs, let alone get jobs in them (not that I can't handle it, but why kill yourself when you can do something else that interests you?).

Exactly what do you mean by particle astrophysics?

There competition to get into astrophysics programs isn't that much worse than any other field of physics. Graduate schools need large amounts of serf-labor, but that's a good thing because it encourages people to keep admissions open.

Also, I'm interested in QCD because I read about lattice gauge theories and related stuff and it seems like a really interesting and highly computational field that I'd like to get into.How active is this area of research?

Very.
 
Exactly what do you mean by particle astrophysics?
I'm not exactly sure. I see it being used in the same context as high energy astrophysics. When I was applying to a few internships for this summer, I came across one project that involved studying dark matter annihilation around black holes. I'd assume that this falls in the realm of particle astrophysics (whatever that really means). What I'd really like to know is what these fields are, because I'm not too sure myself what constitutes particle astrophysics/astroparticle physics.

I also read that lattice field theories can be useful in condensed matter as well. I'm not totally against working in condensed matter like some people, I'd just like to do something interesting. Field theories interest me, and so do solving problems in physics numerically. So of course, if this is true, it might give me a better chance to do physics post-graduate school.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top