What Forms on the Cathode During Electrolysis of Iron(II) Sulphate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hms.tech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrolysis
AI Thread Summary
During the electrolysis of a 1 M Iron(II) sulfate solution using inert electrodes, hydrogen gas forms at the cathode instead of solid iron. This occurs because the reduction potential for the formation of hydrogen from water (-0.83 V) is more favorable than that for iron(II) ions (-0.44 V). The negligible concentration of hydrogen ions in the solution allows for the reduction of water molecules to produce hydrogen gas. While some suggest ignoring hydrogen ion presence, a more accurate approach involves using the Nernst equation to account for all species in the solution. Ultimately, the comparison of reduction potentials indicates that hydrogen will be the primary product at the cathode.
hms.tech
Messages
246
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am given a 1 M solution of Iron(II)sulphate(aq) and it is being electrolyzed using inert electrodes . What will form on the cathode ?

Homework Equations



Reduction potentials of : Fe =-0.44V
1.PNG

of water to from hydrogen : -0.83V

The Attempt at a Solution


Since iron(II) ion has a more POSITIVE value it is easily reduced at the cathode to form Iron (solid).

Unfortunately this answer is wrong .
The correct answer is Hydrogen will be formed on the cathode ... Why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please help me !
 
hms.tech said:
of water to from hydrogen : -0.83V

Please elaborate.

Generally speaking hydrogen gets reduced at 0 V by definition, doesn't it?
 
Borek said:
Please elaborate.

Generally speaking hydrogen gets reduced at 0 V by definition, doesn't it?

It does indeed but that is something different. In this particular example we have :

Fe(II) ions , water molecules, extremely low number of Hydrogen ions and hydroxide ions, Sulphate ions .

Since the concentration of Hydrogen ions is almost negligible (as is the case in any aqueous solution) it should be OK to ignore them . So to form hydrogen gas at the cathode the reaction that occurs (in reality) is :

2 water molecules + 2 electrons → one molecule of hydrogen gas + 2 hydroxide ions with a standard redox potential of -0.83V
 
hms.tech said:
Since the concentration of Hydrogen ions is almost negligible (as is the case in any aqueous solution) it should be OK to ignore them . So to form hydrogen gas at the cathode the reaction that occurs (in reality) is :

2 water molecules + 2 electrons → one molecule of hydrogen gas + 2 hydroxide ions with a standard redox potential of -0.83V

No, that's not a correct approach. To be exact you should not just ignore H+ presence, but take into account everything, including partial pressure of hydrogen (good luck with, as it is initially zero), and plug it all into the Nernst equation. You should do the same with your other reaction, remembering that initial concentration of OH- is not zero either (actually it is identical to the initial concentration of H+), and that -0.83 V is given for a solution in a standard state (which means concentration of OH- equal to 1M).

This is by no means a trivial prediction, but as long as you are not expected to do a very thorough analysis, just comparing -0.44 V with 0 V should do. Perhaps with some estimate of the H+ reduction potential based on just pH.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top