What formulas do I need to solve the above problems?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a user seeking formulas to solve physics problems related to neutron stars, galaxy mass, and Hubble's law. Key points include the need for formulas to calculate the speed of a neutron star's equator, orbital speed of particles, total mass of the Galaxy within a specified radius, and the time for the distance to the Coma Cluster to double. Participants suggest using circular orbit acceleration formulas and trigonometry for calculations, emphasizing the importance of understanding gravitational forces and spherical symmetry in mass distribution. The user expresses confusion about how to derive mass from rotational speed and the comparison of answers, indicating a need for clearer guidance on these concepts.
Red_Night
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was going to put this up in the homework forum, but I feel the folks down here are more capable of helping me out.

I have to do an assignment, but I cannot go in for office hours to get help from my professor. Regretfully, I lost the sheet and forgot to grab another until just a few days ago and now I'm on my own. All I really need are the formulas.

Here goes:
1. A 10-km-radius neutron star is spinning one-thousand times per second.

a) Calculate the speed of a point on its equator, and compare it with the speed of light.

b) Calculate the orbital speed of a particle in a circular orbit just above the neutron star's surface, and compare with your answer to part (a).

2. Calculate the total mass of the Galaxy lying within 20 kpc of the Galactic center if the rotational speed at that radius is 240 km/s.

3) Centaurus A lies at a distance of 4 Mpc from Earth. This galaxy has radiu jets that span across the sky -- from the end of one lobe to the end of the other lobe-- with an angular diameter equivalent of 28.5 full moon widths. If the jets are equal in length how long is one of them in pc. (hint: one full moon is .5 degrees in angular diameter)

4. According to Hubble's law, with Ho=70 km/sec/Mpc, how long will it take for the distance from the Milky Way Galaxy to the Coma Cluster to double? (Hint: You don't need to look up the distance to the coma cluster)

1. I can do part a, but I am completely flabbergasted at part b.

2. Need formula

3. Need formula

4. I believe I can do this one, but don't I need the velocity of the coma cluster to solve it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
1b, and 2. How would one determine orbital velocity at a given altitude from a large mass? In other words, what forces are balanced?
 
1b) Use the circular orbit acceleration formula: a=v^2/r. Now just think what supplies the acceleration?

2) Use the same formula as 1b. Keep in mind what supplies the acceleration. I believe we can assume spherical symmetry since the dark matter distribution (majority of the mass) is more or less spherical.

3) This is just simple trig. Draw an isosceles triangle with and angle of 28.5*.5 degrees as the angle. The opposite leg is the length you want to find. The bisector of that leg to your angle is 4 Mpc. Do some trig (split the triangle into 2 right triangles), and you should get the answer.

4) You don't need the velocity or the distance. Just find how long it takes the scale factor a to double. For uniform expansion, a governs the expansion of the whole universe. So when a doubles, the proper distances to every point doubles. Remember:

H=\frac{1}{a}\frac{da}{dt}
 
Thank you guys very much for your replies. This has really helped.

@ Astronuc: The force of gravity pulling the particle down and the force of movement to the side?

@ Matterwave: I'm really confused as to how one gets mass out of the equation you listed. It seems that there's a bit more to questions 1b and 2 than I thought.

I'm thinking I need to figure out how massive certain volumes-

I just realized v represented volume. Now I get it.
 
One more thing: what does it mean to compare the answers?

Edit:

Okay, for 1b, do you take the cube root of what you get from the formula?

I'm confused about where to get the density for number 2. Am I on the right track?

Edit 2: Yeah, I'm still completely confused how one calculates mass from that info.
 
Last edited:
Rotational speed has no real effect on orbital velocity.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top