What happened to that report of high radiation near Russia

In summary, a few weeks ago, reports of high levels of radiation similar to what Sweden found during the Chernobyl disaster were circulating. However, it was determined that the source of this radiation was a leak at a waste processing facility in Russia's southern Urals. The only isotope released was Ruthenium-106, which has a relatively short half-life and poses little to no risk to the public. The levels released were significantly lower than those released during Chernobyl and have had no impact on Europe's radiation levels.
  • #1
HowlerMonkey
367
17
A few weeks ago, there were reports of super high levels of radiation similar to what sweden found when chernobyl ejected core material.

Were these reports in error or have they not yet found the source?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Google "ruthenium radioactivity". You will get many news articles about it.
 
  • #3
I heard something about high levels of a Ruthenium isotope having been detected.
That would not indicate a Chernobyl type of event.
Last I heard was that `it could be accidental release of material intended for use in radiotherapy treatment.
 
  • #4
The isotope ruthenium-106 (106Ru) was detected by various European agencies.

From Euronews (http://www.euronews.com/2017/11/21/explained-ruthenium-106-and-europe-s-radioactive-cloud)
Both IRSN and Germany’s radiation protection agency said the source of the emission was in Russia’s southern Urals.

Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear energy corporation, contradicted these findings, saying there were no traces of ruthenium 106 anywhere apart from at St Petersburg from September 25 and October 7.

But then Russia’s meteorological agency, Roshydromet, published data on November 20 that was consistent with the German and French conclusions.

From IRSN, Detection of Ruthenium 106 in France and in Europe: Results of IRSN’s investigations
http://www.irsn.fr/EN/newsroom/News...in-Europe-Results-of-IRSN-investigations.aspx
As soon as it became aware of the first detections of Ruthenium 106 in the atmosphere in Europe, IRSN mobilized all its means of radiological monitoring of the atmosphere and conducted regular analysis of the filters from its monitoring stations. For the period from September 27 to October 13, 2017, only the stations of Seyne-sur-Mer, Nice and Ajaccio revealed the presence of Ruthenium 106 in trace amounts. Since October 13, 2017, Ruthenium 106 is no longer detected in France.

Measurement results from European stations communicated to the Institute since October 3, 2017, have confirmed the presence of Ruthenium 106 in the atmosphere of the majority of European countries. The results obtained for sampling periods later than October 6, 2017, showed a steady decrease in Ruthenium 106 levels, which is currently no longer detected in Europe.

From Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Deutschland
https://www.bfs.de/SharedDocs/Kurzmeldungen/BfS/EN/2017/1003-ruthenium-106.html

Ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) is used as a radiation source in cancer therapy for the treatment of ocular tumours. Ruthenium can also occur during the reprocessing of nuclear fuel elements. In addition, ruthenium-106 is used in radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG), which serve for the power supply of satellites.

Ruthenium-106 is one of many fission products, and by itself would not indicate an accident of a nuclear reactor. We would also expect isotopes of Te, I, Cs, Xe, Br, Kr, and others.

If it comes from Mayak, then perhaps there was a process upset.

Russia admits spike in radioactive ruthenium-106 over Ural Mountains amid fears of nuclear accident
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-22/russia-admits-ruthenium-106-spike-near-ural-mountains/9178446
 
  • #5
I looked up ruthenium
106 has half life about a year
shorter half life isotope wasn't mentioned so i figured it's not from an operating reactor and pretty much dismissed it as ' a curiosity ' ...
 
  • #6
The Ru-106 was from a leak at a waste processing facility. The only isotope leaked was Ru-106. So it's nothing like chernobyl.
It has a half life of less than a year.
Decays into Rh-106 with a half life of 30 seconds which decays into Pd-106 which is stable.
In two years only 25% will remain. In ten years it'll be entirely gone.

The levels released were about 3-8 Ci. Which is a pretty significant release but no where near the 150 million Ci released during chernobyl. They'd have to take precautions within a few km of the facility but levels in Europe are harmless. Has little to no impact on dose already received from natural background radiation.
 

1. What is the report about high radiation near Russia?

The report is about a sudden increase in radiation levels detected in the atmosphere near Russia in late August 2019. This was initially reported by the Russian meteorological agency and later confirmed by other international agencies.

2. What caused the high radiation levels near Russia?

The exact cause of the high radiation levels is still unknown. Some experts speculate that it could be due to a nuclear accident or a malfunction at a nuclear power plant. However, further investigation is needed to determine the exact cause.

3. Is the radiation near Russia harmful to human health?

At the moment, there is no evidence to suggest that the radiation near Russia poses a threat to human health. The reported levels were relatively low and did not exceed any safety limits. However, it is important to continue monitoring the situation and take necessary precautions.

4. Has the radiation dissipated or is it still present near Russia?

According to recent reports, the radiation levels near Russia have returned to normal and are no longer a cause for concern. However, monitoring will continue to ensure that there are no further spikes in radiation levels.

5. What actions are being taken to investigate the high radiation levels near Russia?

International agencies, including the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), are working with Russian authorities to investigate the cause of the high radiation levels. They are also conducting air and ground measurements to gather more data and determine the extent of the radiation release.

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
845
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
879
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
Back
Top