What happened to that report of high radiation near Russia

  • Thread starter Thread starter HowlerMonkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation Report
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around reports of high radiation levels detected near Russia, specifically concerning the isotope ruthenium-106 (Ru-106). Participants explore the implications of these findings, potential sources, and comparisons to historical nuclear events like Chernobyl. The conversation includes technical details about the isotope, its uses, and the context of its detection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention reports of high radiation levels similar to those observed during the Chernobyl disaster, questioning the accuracy and source of these reports.
  • Others suggest that the detected ruthenium-106 does not indicate a Chernobyl-type event, proposing that it may be linked to accidental releases from medical radiotherapy materials.
  • A participant cites various European agencies confirming the detection of Ru-106 and indicates a potential source in Russia's southern Urals, while noting conflicting statements from Russian authorities.
  • It is noted that Ru-106 has a half-life of about a year and is used in cancer therapy, which raises questions about the implications of its release.
  • Some participants argue that the levels of Ru-106 detected are significant but far less than those released during Chernobyl, suggesting that the impact on public health is minimal.
  • One participant emphasizes that the only isotope leaked was Ru-106, arguing that this distinguishes the incident from a nuclear reactor accident.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the Ru-106 detection, with some downplaying the significance of the findings while others raise concerns about the potential for a nuclear incident. There is no consensus on the source or the severity of the situation.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various sources and reports, highlighting discrepancies in the information provided by different agencies and the need for further clarification regarding the context of the radiation levels detected.

HowlerMonkey
Messages
368
Reaction score
17
A few weeks ago, there were reports of super high levels of radiation similar to what sweden found when chernobyl ejected core material.

Were these reports in error or have they not yet found the source?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Google "ruthenium radioactivity". You will get many news articles about it.
 
I heard something about high levels of a Ruthenium isotope having been detected.
That would not indicate a Chernobyl type of event.
Last I heard was that `it could be accidental release of material intended for use in radiotherapy treatment.
 
The isotope ruthenium-106 (106Ru) was detected by various European agencies.

From Euronews (http://www.euronews.com/2017/11/21/explained-ruthenium-106-and-europe-s-radioactive-cloud)
Both IRSN and Germany’s radiation protection agency said the source of the emission was in Russia’s southern Urals.

Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear energy corporation, contradicted these findings, saying there were no traces of ruthenium 106 anywhere apart from at St Petersburg from September 25 and October 7.

But then Russia’s meteorological agency, Roshydromet, published data on November 20 that was consistent with the German and French conclusions.

From IRSN, Detection of Ruthenium 106 in France and in Europe: Results of IRSN’s investigations
http://www.irsn.fr/EN/newsroom/News...in-Europe-Results-of-IRSN-investigations.aspx
As soon as it became aware of the first detections of Ruthenium 106 in the atmosphere in Europe, IRSN mobilized all its means of radiological monitoring of the atmosphere and conducted regular analysis of the filters from its monitoring stations. For the period from September 27 to October 13, 2017, only the stations of Seyne-sur-Mer, Nice and Ajaccio revealed the presence of Ruthenium 106 in trace amounts. Since October 13, 2017, Ruthenium 106 is no longer detected in France.

Measurement results from European stations communicated to the Institute since October 3, 2017, have confirmed the presence of Ruthenium 106 in the atmosphere of the majority of European countries. The results obtained for sampling periods later than October 6, 2017, showed a steady decrease in Ruthenium 106 levels, which is currently no longer detected in Europe.

From Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Deutschland
https://www.bfs.de/SharedDocs/Kurzmeldungen/BfS/EN/2017/1003-ruthenium-106.html

Ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) is used as a radiation source in cancer therapy for the treatment of ocular tumours. Ruthenium can also occur during the reprocessing of nuclear fuel elements. In addition, ruthenium-106 is used in radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG), which serve for the power supply of satellites.

Ruthenium-106 is one of many fission products, and by itself would not indicate an accident of a nuclear reactor. We would also expect isotopes of Te, I, Cs, Xe, Br, Kr, and others.

If it comes from Mayak, then perhaps there was a process upset.

Russia admits spike in radioactive ruthenium-106 over Ural Mountains amid fears of nuclear accident
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-22/russia-admits-ruthenium-106-spike-near-ural-mountains/9178446
 
I looked up ruthenium
106 has half life about a year
shorter half life isotope wasn't mentioned so i figured it's not from an operating reactor and pretty much dismissed it as ' a curiosity ' ...
 
The Ru-106 was from a leak at a waste processing facility. The only isotope leaked was Ru-106. So it's nothing like chernobyl.
It has a half life of less than a year.
Decays into Rh-106 with a half life of 30 seconds which decays into Pd-106 which is stable.
In two years only 25% will remain. In ten years it'll be entirely gone.

The levels released were about 3-8 Ci. Which is a pretty significant release but no where near the 150 million Ci released during chernobyl. They'd have to take precautions within a few km of the facility but levels in Europe are harmless. Has little to no impact on dose already received from natural background radiation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
11K