What Happens at the Nuclear Level During Radioactive Emissions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uspatange
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactivity
uspatange
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. when alpha particles are emitted, the atomic number decreases by2, but is the new element charged due to more number of electrons? If not, what happens at the nuclear level? Please, Explain it simillarly about beta particles.
2.when describing the emission of beta particles, we say that

1n0 -----------> 1p+1 + 0e-1

but at the time of describing the nuclear stability, we say that

1n0 -----------> 1p+1 + 0π-1

SO are the pion and the electron one and the same? or does the neutron undergoes different reactions at different times? If yes, how does the neutron come to know, which reaction to undergo and when? If not, then what does exactly happen?

3. At the time of gamma radiations, neither atomic nor mass no. of an atom change, so what is the benefit or cause for any radioactive atom to emit gamma radiations? Does the radiation causes it to stabilize itself by some other way?


Please answer all these questions and you will help me understand all the concepts clearly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. The alpha particle HAS Z=2! So it is carrying away two protons. So if it was a neutral atom decaying with alpha it will become a 2- ion

Beta decay, a neutron (Z=0) becomes proton (Z=+1) and electron (Z=-1).

2. No the pion and electron are different particles, and the guy who told you that neutrons can decay to a proton and a pion is wrong. Where did you find it? Maybe you are referring to the good'ol pion exchange model of the strong interaction?

3. Compare to atoms exmitting characteristic X-rays by letting the electron changing its state to a lower lyging one in Energy space -> protons and neutrons are orbiting around each other and can be excited to different levels and so on, so when going back to the ground state, Gamma rays are emitted.
 
malawi_glenn said:
Maybe you are referring to the good'ol pion exchange model of the strong interaction?

In fact my concepts about the model are quite unclear. So will you please tell me what the new model of strong interaction is and what the old model failed to explain to give rise to the new one?
 
I am not telling you that it is wrong because it is old, I am telling you that the neutron don't DECAY in this process:

1n0 -----------> 1p+1 + 0π-1

You are mixing concepts, you are mixing decay and a VIRTUAL process.

Any way, your question is in GENERAL this one:

Suppose you have a particle A, which has several decay modes: B,C,D

Now when the particle A "decides" to decay, it will choose one of possible B,C,D. BUT each decay mode is not equal probable in general. Say that the probability of decaying into B is 20%, C 70% and D 10%. Then you are back to basic theory of probability...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top