QuantumDefect said:
In three years I am going to graduate school to get my phD in physics . However I am confused in what goes on there. If you guys could tell me what it is/was like while answering these questions it would be much appreciated...
1)Do you specialize in a certain field of physics?
2) How long does it take to graduate?
3) How many courses do you generally take in a semester?
4) and can you take other courses like math beyond what is required? (I would love to take more math courses)
5)What tests do you have to go through besides finals?
6)At the end of your last year what do you have to do to get your phD?
I think there are certain ... er... "misconception" in this string, especially in terms of what school is "best" for so-and-so. Therefore, I'll start at the beginning and address your questions first.
I will have to make the assumption that you are referring to a graduate school in a US institution (since most parts of the world hardly refer to a "graduate school"), since you did not clarify where you intend to go.
1) You HAVE to specialize in a field of physics when you are in graduate school. The whole point of being in a graduate school in physics is to be VERY good at a particular area of physics in such a way that you become an expert of that area by the time you graduate. It doesn't mean, however, that you are ignorant of other areas since you never know how they are interconnected or relevant to the field you are looking at.
2) The statistics from the AIP indicates that the average length of time for a physics Ph.D in the US is 5 1/2 years. Keep in mind that this is the time period for an incoming physics graduate students with a B.Sc. I took 6 years to obtain my Ph.D. In general, I think experimentalists (of which I am one) tend to take longer than theorists.
3) The number of courses one takes can vary greatly from year to year, ranging from 3 to ZERO. The first couple of years you have a set of required courses. Then (assuming you pass the qualifier), you take courses that are relevant to the area you intend to specialize in. You will also register for a course in something like an independent study or "thesis research", or something similar to that. This is with approval of your academic advisor who will be your thesis committee chairman/woman. In general, you seldom take more than 2 classes per semester in the beginning. This is because in many graduate school, you have to get AT LEAST a grade of "B" or better in your courses. Anything less may be considered as a failure and won't count towards your graduation credits.
By the time you have completed all your classes, you will probably only register for your thesis research as an "official" course (in many schools, you can register for this class repeatedly each semester). That's why I said that you can have zero course depending on which year you are in.
4) What you take outside the dept. depends on what you are specializing in. If no one is paying for your education (i.e. you're not getting some form of assistantship), then you can take whatever extra classes that you want since you're paying for it. Whether it will count as part of the requirement for graduation depends entirely on the departmental policy and your academic advisor.
5) You will have to pass the qualifier. ALL US physics institutions have that. Some schools even have an added oral exams at some point along the way. This may be simply an oral version of the qualifier, or as a form of thesis proposal, i.e. you propose the area of study that you want to go into to your potential thesis committee. Then will test you on whether you have the necessary basic knowledge to be able to complete it, or they will evaluate if the area you're going into is "legitimate".
6) Final year: (i) write thesis (ii) make a gazillion modifications based on your advisor's recommendations (iii) make another zillion modifications based on your thesis committee's recommendations (iv) defend your thesis (v) make more modification if necessary based on the committee's recommendations after your defense (vi) submit thesis to graduate school (vii) make modifications, if necessary, based on the thesis style of your school.
You really need to pay attention to ALL the requirements for each individual school that you are considering. The good thing about the web is that most of these are available online, rather than having to ask for a catalog from each school. These requirements can vary greatly. For example, there are many schools/physics depts. that REQUIRE that you have at least one published paper in a peer-reviewed journal by the time you submit your thesis for consideration. This is one indication that use to judge that you are doing an original work. Sometime this is the requirement of your academic advisor. I know my advisor made sure I had 3 by the time I faced the thesis committee. A good academic advisor will make sure you have at least established your name in that field of study by the time you graduate by publishing your work, and by presenting it at various conferences. These are the recognition you need if you want to go on for prominent postdoctoral fellowships and faculty appointments.
Regarding what school is best for "theoretical physics", this is VERY vague and rather meaningless. "Theoretical physics" is flavorless. One needs to specify the area of study FIRST, then decide if one is going to be an experimentalist or a theorist. Practically all areas of physics, except for string (and maybe computational physics via technicality), have the dichotomy of having a theoretical part and an experimental part. If I ask you "what is the BEST school for condensed matter theory", I can tell you off hand that maybe Princeton and MIT and Caltech may not be the "best" places to go. UIUC, Stanford, and UC-Santa Barbara have consistently ranked higher than those three in terms of condensed matter physics in general. This means that these schools consistenly have a strong program in both theoretical and experimental condensed matter. As a theorists, you will gain a tremendous amount of insight into your work if you have experimental results at your fingertips. The same advantage goes the other way - an experimentalist has a huge upper hand if there are theorists who can either provide a novel interpretation of the experimental observation, or suggest a particular measurement.
The moral of the story is that do not be deceived by "name" schools. Figures out what area of study you want to go into, and THEN decide where is the best opportunity. You'd be surprised that some of the smaller, less well-known schools can offer a lot more than the big ones, especially if the big ones are crowded and your advisor has dozens of students to supervise.
Zz.