What Happens to a Pole Spinning Near Light Speed?

AbyssalVortex
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok. I got this today from looking at a crane spinning around.

What if you had an extremely long pole, huge order of magnitude, and you spin it. As you go outward, the velocity of the particles of the pole increase. As this velocity nears c, what happens to the pole as you keep going further away from the origin of rotation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't work. There is no such thing as a pole that is as rigid as you are thinking of. This question in one form or another is asked here every few months. Do a forum search for "rigid body"
 
Last edited:
What Phinds said. Also, there's an entry in the FAQ at the top of this forum: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=536289
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AbyssalVortex said:
As this velocity nears c, what happens to the pole as you keep going further away from the origin of rotation?
It breaks.
 
Ha, wow, can you say oblivious. Thanks phinds and Nugatory.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top