What happens to energy in a complete inelastic collision?

AI Thread Summary
In a complete inelastic collision, kinetic energy is not conserved, while linear momentum is conserved. This discrepancy arises because some energy is transformed into other forms, such as heat, sound, or internal energy. The exact distribution of energy loss depends on the specifics of the collision. In scenarios like space, sound energy is irrelevant, but heat and internal energy still play a role. Understanding these principles clarifies the energy transformations occurring during such collisions.
Adit
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Could be a stupid question. But in case of complete inelastic collision, when one particle is at rest and other one collides with it and both move together, I made calculations(pretty simple ones), the conservation of linear momentum and conservation of kinetic energy give different results.
Can anyone explain it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Adit said:
conservation of kinetic energy give different results

They should, kinetic energy is only conserved in elastic collisions.
 
So, what happens to rest of the energy? Heat? Any law of thermodynamic?
 
Depends on the collision. Heat, internal energy, sound, etc.
 
I mean there's a precise amount of energy getting drained. It has to impact somewhere, like if in space, sound won't be a concern. If you can tell it more specifically. But thanks anyway, I got it. A burden out of my head.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top