What happens to gaussian white noise when derived in continuous time?

lagoule
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've got a problem where a recording signal is a signal + gaussian white noise (quite classic). I derive this signal and while I know the theoretical result of the derivative of the noiseless signal, but I can't figure out what happens to the noise after the operation.

So, basically, what happens to gaussian white noise if you derive it (in continuous time)? Will the result be statically gaussian? something else? What will be the variance and mean?

The goal of the problem is to perform detection of events in white noise, and the derivative is used to increase the SNR of the event.

Thanks for any help,

Jonathan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
True white noise has infinite power spectral density and no maximum frequency. I'm not a mathematician but that's probably not differentiable. Bandlited white noise is probably what you have on the real world an that is differentiable.
 
Opps, it's gaussian. You can differentiate in the frequecy domain. The phase will continue to be random.
 
Hello,

Off course, the noise is band-limited, as is the differentiator circuit.

I didn't think of looking at the problem in the frequency domain. If the white noise is flat in frequency domain, then its derivative will be linear. This also confirms that if the noise isn't band-limited, its derivative will have infinite power.

However, this doesn't give me the statistical properties of the derivative, it may hint that they aren't mathematically defined though.

Thanks for your help,

Jonathan
 
For any signal, the spectrum of the derivative is ω times the transform of the signal, i.e. ω·F(ω). So any peaked spectrum gets shifted toward higher frequencies.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top