What happens to molecules after binding to a taste receptor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cool_walking_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of ligands, such as taste and smell molecules, when they interact with receptors. Ligands can unbind from receptors, undergoing multiple cycles of binding and unbinding until they are no longer available. The duration a ligand remains bound to a receptor is determined by the "on-rate" (binding frequency) and "off-rate" (unbinding frequency), with the off-rate also referred to as the dissociation constant. This understanding is crucial for explaining how repeated exposure to a taste or smell can alter perception, as the receptor's availability can diminish with continued interaction. The conversation highlights the complexity of sensory receptor dynamics and their implications for taste and olfactory experiences.
cool_walking_
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Do they unbind somehow? Or are they somehow "eaten" by the receptor, so the more you taste of something, the less of it gets through? I'm only a Wikipedia/Youtube student so my knowledge has weird gaps all over the place. Got thinking about this by noticing an interesting taste that some medication had.

I'd also be curious about smell receptors.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
They unbind. In fact, an exposure to a ligand involves many cycles of binding and unbinding until the ligand is no longer available. How much time a ligand spends on the receptor (on average) can be found by comparing the "on-rate" (how often ligand binds) to the "off-rate" (how often it unbinds). Another name for the off-rate is the dissociation constant.
 
Thanks :)
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top