What Happens to the Excess Energy in a Compressed Spring?

AI Thread Summary
When a spring is compressed by a constant force, the work done is calculated as Fx, resulting in kx^2. However, the energy stored in the spring is actually 1/2kx^2, indicating that the additional work done is converted into kinetic energy when a mass is attached. As the spring compresses, the force increases from zero to kx, meaning the average force is F/2, leading to the energy equation. When an external electric field is applied, it exerts a constant force, causing the mass to oscillate around a new equilibrium point. The discussion clarifies the relationship between work done, energy storage, and kinetic energy in spring dynamics.
jd12345
Messages
251
Reaction score
2
If you apply a force F and compress a spring of spring constant k by x distance what is the work done by us?
I know energy stored is 1/2kx2 but is the work done by us the same?
We are applying a cosntant force F and dispalcement is x so work done by us should be Fx right? And F = kx so work done by us is kx2

Where does the other 1/2kx2 go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jd12345 said:
Where does the other 1/2kx2 go?
Imagine there was a mass on the end of the spring. If you used the minimum force required to compress the spring, then that force would vary from 0 (at the start) to the maximum value of kX at full compression. The work you'd do would equal 1/2kx2. But if you use a constant force F = kX to compress the spring, then the extra work that you do goes into increasing the kinetic energy of the mass.
 
I agree with DocAl
When you start to compress(or stretch) the spring you start with zero force and increase to final force,F and F = kx. The work done = average force x extension.
If the spring behaves linearly the average force = F/2 therefore work done = kx/2 . x
= 0.5kx^2
 
Okay thank you - but one more doubt
Suppsoe a mass m attached to a spring with charge q. Suddenly electric field is switched on so it will exert a constant force right? So in this case the other 1/kx^2 goes into kinetic energy and the spring oscillates? Have i got it right?
 
That's right. The mass will oscillate about the new equilibrium point (where the net force on the mass is zero).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top