What Happens to the Tensions in a Cut String Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vibhor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a system of blocks connected by strings and a spring when one string is cut. After the cut, the tensions in the strings change due to the acceleration of the masses involved, with the left 5 kg block remaining stationary while the 1 kg blocks accelerate. The calculations reveal that the new tension in the system can be derived by considering the net forces and effective mass, leading to a tension of 21g/4. Participants express confusion over the provided answer options, suggesting a possible misprint. The conversation highlights the assumptions made about string behavior and the instantaneous nature of tension changes in such problems.
Vibhor
Messages
971
Reaction score
40

Homework Statement



?temp_hash=935184fa0c5c76454084ea523756af8b.png


Since the image is not clear ,the blocks on the left are 1 Kg(top) and 5kg(bottom) connected by a spring. On the right are 1Kg(top) and 2Kg(bottom) .The bottom right string is cut .

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Suppose T1 is the tension in string AB , T2 in string CD, T3 in EF and GH , T4(=kx) in the spring .

Just after AB is cut T4 (i.e spring force) does not change . Tension in strings CD become T2' and in string EF and GH becomes T3' .

Writing force balance equation for the two 1 Kg blocks and 2Kg block ,

For the left 1Kg block , 6g - T3' = 1a

For the right 1Kg block , T3' -T2' - 1g = 1a

For the right 2Kg block , T2' - 2g = 2a

Solving , I get T3' = 21g/4 , but this isn't an option .

Please help me with the problem .

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • block.PNG
    block.PNG
    38.5 KB · Views: 668
Physics news on Phys.org
The form of the offered answer d strongly suggests a misprint. Why would they not specify it as 5g?
I agree with your answer.
 
  • Like
Likes Vibhor
haruspex said:
The form of the offered answer d strongly suggests a misprint. Why would they not specify it as 5g?
I agree with your answer.

Thanks . But the answer given is option c) .

Option d) i.e 20g/4 is obtained under the assumption that the two blocks on the left (connected by the spring) have same acceleration just after the string is cut .

Do you agree that just after the string is cut , the acceleration of 5Kg block on left is 0 whereas that of both the 1Kg blocks is 3g/4 ?
 
Last edited:
Yes, I agree with those accelerations.
Vibhor said:
Option d) i.e 20g/4 is obtained under the assumption that the two blocks on the left (connected by the spring) have same acceleration just after the string is cut .
Doesn't that error give 4g?
 
  • Like
Likes Vibhor
haruspex said:
Doesn't that error give 4g?

Yes , that gives 4g .

Could you help me understand why tensions T2 and T3 should change when the string is cut ? Why doesn't T2 and T3 remain same just after the string is cut ?
 
Vibhor said:
Yes , that gives 4g .

Could you help me understand why tensions T2 and T3 should change when the string is cut ? Why doesn't T2 and T3 remain same just after the string is cut ?
Well, why would they? Masses are accelerating. If T3 stayed the same the top left mass would not move. T2 had to match the weight below it plus the tension in the string which has now been cut.
 
  • Like
Likes Vibhor
Vibhor said:
Yes , that gives 4g .

Could you help me understand why tensions T2 and T3 should change when the string is cut ? Why doesn't T2 and T3 remain same just after the string is cut ?

This problem to some extent exposes the assumptions you make when dealing with a "light, inextensible" string. If you think of the strings as slightly extensible (hence slightly stretched), then the behaviour of the string and spring should be the similar at the instant the system is released. Both should instantaneously retain their current tension until the system has had time to move.

The assumption for the inextensible string, however, is that this change happens instantaneously (or, at least, in a very short time). Whereas, the assumption for the spring is that this takes time to happen (i.e. it's not instantaneous).
 
  • Like
Likes haruspex and Vibhor
Do you agree with the results in the OP and post#3 ?
 
Vibhor said:
Do you agree with the results in the OP and post#3 ?

@haruspex is never wrong!

To add something, another way to do it is to calculate the acceleration of the 3 masses. The 5kg mass is instantaneously out of the equation and replaced by the 5g force in the spring. So:

Net force on the 3-body system (down to the left): ##F = 5g + 1g - 3g = 3g##
Total effective mass ##M = 4kg##.
Acceleration of 3-body system ##a = 3g/4##

Therefore:

##6g - T = 3g/4##
##T = 21g/4##
 
  • Like
Likes Vibhor
  • #10
PeroK said:
@haruspex is never wrong!

I agree :smile:

PeroK said:
To add something, another way to do it is to calculate the acceleration of the 3 masses. The 5kg mass is instantaneously out of the equation and replaced by the 5g force in the spring. So:

Net force on the 3-body system (down to the left): ##F = 5g + 1g - 3g = 3g##
Total effective mass ##M = 4kg##.
Acceleration of 3-body system ##a = 3g/4##

Therefore:

##6g - T = 3g/4##
##T = 21g/4##

Nice !
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
@haruspex is never wrong!
Steady on there! Perhaps I do as well as the Captain of HMS Pinafore.
What, never?
No, never.
What, never??
Well, hardly ever!
 
Back
Top