What Happens to Wave Measurements When You Sail at the Speed of Light?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a thought experiment involving wave measurements from a stationary boat and the implications of sailing into the waves. The original hypothesis suggests that sailing at the same speed as the wave results in a perceived doubling of wave speed, halving the wavelength and doubling the frequency. However, responses clarify that this reasoning reflects the classical Doppler effect and that the speed of light's constancy cannot be derived from water wave behavior. It is emphasized that the wavelength does not change for the observer, and the key variable that alters is the frequency. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in understanding wave behavior and relativistic effects.
Gaz
Messages
74
Reaction score
4
Hi I want to create a thought experiment involving waves of any kind. I am going to create a thought experiment I am on a boat that is at rest in the ocean. I am standing on the boat measuring the size of the waves and the frequency. So I measure the wave along the side of my boat to have a length of 6 meters and a frequency of 1 per second. So i deduce the wave is traveling at 6 m/p/s (6 meters per second).

Now I sail my boat at 6 m/p/s into the waves what is the outcome ?

My Hypothesis is I would see the waves passing me by at twice the speed so the wavelength is 3 m/p/ half s (3 meters per half second) and as the wavelength half's the frequency doubles to 2 per second.
So I conclude when you measure a wave you cannot add your speed to the wave as your motion has to be added or deducted from the wavelength which will effect the frequency and that is why the speed of light is constant to all observers. Any speed added by your motion is simply deducted from the wavelength and added to frequency. So the speed of light remains the same regardless of your motion. And it is not time that changes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gaz said:
as the wavelength halves
Why would the wavelenght be different ? Would the wavelength double if you go in the opposite direction ?
 
First, what you are describing is called the classical (non-relativistic) Doppler effect. If you read about it, in any standard physics textbook, you will see where you are missing the point.
Second, you made a big leap when you concluded that the speed of light is the same for all observers, by the strength of your argument, which is based on material (water) waves. The speed of water waves is not the same for all observers. You should know that there is no explanation for the speed of light being the same for all (inertial) observers. It is an axiom, the truth of which is borne out by the success of experiments.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Gaz said:
My Hypothesis is I would see the waves passing me by at twice the speed so the wavelength is 3 m/p/ half s (3 meters per half second) and as the wavelength half's the frequency doubles to 2 per second.

so as the other two have suggested, the wavelength isn't changing, and for you nor is time
so that leaves one choice for what is changing ... can you think what that is and why ?
You have answered it without realising :wink:
Dave
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top