I What happens when two waves in counter phase affect a conductive material?

AI Thread Summary
When two waves emitted from the same source are in counterphase, they do not produce electron displacement in a conductive material. This occurs because the waves effectively cancel each other out, resulting in no net voltage at the feed point of an antenna. If two distinct antennas are used, there may be some power directed in various directions, but cancellation occurs in the direction of interference. The discussion highlights the importance of wave phase and source alignment in wave behavior. Overall, the interaction of counterphase waves leads to energy dissipation rather than useful wave propagation.
lambjx
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
i am writing this message after a short consultation with kuruman. if there are two waves emitted by the same source then with the same direction, but these waves are in counterphase link: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/lookaside/crawler/media/?media_id=100325080043803&imgrefurl=https://www.facebook.com/counterphase/about/&docid=OpDdx0c440xCIM&tbnid=ol8qNK1IvHWYVM&vet=1&source=sh/x/im. when these two waves affect a conductive material they do not produce any electron displacement ?? This is new link https://www.google.com/imgres?imgur...eLM&tbnid=HntqSYCn1_AiZM&vet=1&source=sh/x/im
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lambjx said:
two waves emitted by the same source
Hmm, what does this mean? How can two distinct waves be produced by the same source?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and davenn
Dale said:
Hmm, what does this mean? How can two distinct waves be produced by the same source?
hi Dale I wrote "emitted from the same source" to show that they are perfectly in line. however, if two linear waves on the same plane, which have the same amplitude and frequency but in phase opposition, when they affect the incident material, do not produce any electron displacement?
 
That doesn’t answer my confusion about your question. The only way to be perfectly in line everywhere is to be emitted from the same source, so you are just saying the same thing again. If they are from the same source (so they are perfectly in line everywhere) then how can they be considered two distinct waves?

My confusion about your question is that you are describing one wave but calling it two waves. If you have a single antenna and you are feeding it with two amplifiers that are equal and opposite then you are not producing any voltage in the antenna. You don’t have a wave at all. You are just feeding power directly from one amplifier into the other (which will damage the amplifiers). If you have two separate antennas then they are not the same source / they are not perfectly in line everywhere.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, davenn, nasu and 1 other person
@lambjx You are describing a source that emits nothing, but in a more "complex" way.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
nasu said:
@lambjx You are describing a source that emits nothing, but in a more "complex" way.
If you used two transmitters (synchronised RF feeds in antiphase ) and fed them to the same point on an antenna, then there would be Zero Volts at that feed point. (In the thought experiment, the two feed lines would be the same length, of course). What would happen to all the Power from the transmitters? All that power would be dissipated within the transmitters - they would just get much hotter than when operated correctly - say with 50% efficiency.
If two different antennae were used, they would have some small separation and there would be some power directed in most direction and zero power in the direction where cancellation occurs. Having the antenna very close together would involve strong 'coupling' between the two transmitters so they would 'see each other'. You would get similar problems to what you get when sharing one antenna.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top