What happens with drag and students?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Clausius2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag students
AI Thread Summary
Students frequently express confusion about air resistance and drag coefficients, often due to inadequate explanations from professors. Many students mistakenly apply their understanding of kinetic friction, which is proportional to normal forces, to resistive forces like air resistance. This leads to a perception that drag is unusual and difficult to grasp. The discussion suggests that students may benefit from practical experiments to better understand these concepts, despite lacking knowledge of differential equations. Overall, the need for clearer instruction and hands-on experience in understanding drag and air resistance is emphasized.
Clausius2
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,433
Reaction score
7
During my standing here, I have seen a lot of repetitive threads. But the most recurrent question of every students who post here is about air resistance and drag coefficient. What happens with it?. Is there any hidden mystery we could not see?. This fact is starting to be very unusual and curious. It seems like professors at school don't explain the stuff very well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think that one reason is that when students start with classical mechanics of particles and rigid bodies, they get so used to the idea that kinetic friction is proportional to normal forces that they start to think of all resistive/dissipative forces in this manner. That is, when they encounter air resistance, they think it as weird and diffucult to understand that a resistive force doesn't follow the scheme they are used to.
 
To me, the repetitive questions tend toward actually using the formula to do experiments with real objects (who knows what these people do, because they have not had differential equations).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top