What has to be true to use conservation of momentum vs. energy

AI Thread Summary
Conservation of momentum applies when no external forces act on a system, requiring a net force of zero in each direction for momentum to be conserved. Common examples include collisions between objects and interactions on frictionless surfaces, such as ice skaters or boats pushing off each other. Conservation of energy occurs when no external work is done on the system, with typical external work sources being friction and air resistance. While momentum is conserved in all types of collisions, kinetic energy is only conserved in elastic collisions; inelastic collisions result in energy loss due to deformation. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing physical systems effectively.
hydralisks
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
We are currently learning about conservation of momentum and conservation of energy in my intro physics class @ berkeley.

What must be true for me to use one of the other or both (I'd appreciate some common examples of when to use/when not to use them too, if possible)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of momentum holds for a system when there are no external forces on the system. Since momentum is a vector, we need to check the net force in each direction, and if the net force is zero then the momentum for that direction is conserved.

The primary examples in intro physics are collisions (between blocks, disks, sports equipment, bullets and targets, etc) and also frictionless surface problems like ice skaters who push away from each other or people in boats that push away from each other, etc.

Conservation of energy in a system occurs whenever there is no external work done on the system. Typical causes of external work are friction, air resistance, or normal pushing / pulling.
 
Momentum is conserved in all collisions. Kinetic energy is only conserved in elastic collisions. In the case of inelastic collisions, kinetic energy is lost due to deformation of the objects involved in the collision.
 
Thanks so much for the fast responses! Makes sense!
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top