What Height Does the Package Rebound to After a Perfectly Elastic Collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a perfectly elastic collision between two packages of different masses. The initial velocity of the lighter package, calculated incorrectly as 2.6 m/s, is corrected to 7.67 m/s after realizing the initial calculations were based on an inelastic collision scenario. Participants emphasize using conservation of momentum and energy principles to derive the final velocities of both packages. Ultimately, the rebound height of the lighter package is determined to be 33 cm after the collision. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying initial conditions and applying the right equations for elastic collisions.
mattpd1
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A package of mass m is released from rest at a warehouse loading dock and slides down a 3.0m high frictionless chute to a waiting truck. Unfortunately, the truck driver went on a break without having removed the previous package, of mass 2m, from the bottom of the chute.

Suppose the collision between the packages is perfectly elastic. To what height does the package of mass m rebound?

http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1073693/3/10.P42.jpg




Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



So far I know that the velocity of mass m at the moment of impact is 2.6 m/s. I think I should be using the conservation of energy/momentum to solve for the final velocity of mass m. I then think I can use this velocity to solve for K, and use this to solve for the height from U=mgh. I just can't figure out how to solve the final velocities.

2.6m=mv_{1}_{f}+2mv_{2}_{f}

\frac{1}{2}m(2.6)^2=\frac{1}{2}mv_{1}_{f}^2+mv_{2}_{f}^2

Are these set up right? If so, how do I continue? As you can see my algebra skills may be lacking.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all I see that "m" appears everywhere. Can you simplify it ?
 
Your result of 2.6 m/s is wrong. You can calculate this with (final kinetic energy) = (initial potential energy), so (1/2)mv^2 = mgh

Apart from this your equations are correct. For a start you can divide them by m.

There are 2 ways of doing this. The first is to rearrange the first equation to get v_1 as a function of v_2, and then substitute this in the second equation.

A better way is to find the velocity of the center of mass, and compute all velocities in the reference frame of the center of mass. The equations become

0 = mv_{1}_{f}+2mv_{2}_{f}

(0 because it's the center of mass frame)

KE = \frac{1}{2}mv_{1}_{f}^2+mv_{2} _{f}^2

where KE is the initial kinetic energy in this frame

It's then easy to see that if (v1,v2) is a solution to these equations, so is (-v1,-v2)

Finally you have to transform the velocities back to the rest frame.
 
willem2 said:
Your result of 2.6 m/s is wrong. You can calculate this with (final kinetic energy) = (initial potential energy), so (1/2)mv^2 = mgh

Apart from this your equations are correct. For a start you can divide them by m.

There are 2 ways of doing this. The first is to rearrange the first equation to get v_1 as a function of v_2, and then substitute this in the second equation.

A better way is to find the velocity of the center of mass, and compute all velocities in the reference frame of the center of mass. The equations become

0 = mv_{1}_{f}+2mv_{2}_{f}

(0 because it's the center of mass frame)

KE = \frac{1}{2}mv_{1}_{f}^2+mv_{2} _{f}^2

where KE is the initial kinetic energy in this frame

It's then easy to see that if (v1,v2) is a solution to these equations, so is (-v1,-v2)

Finally you have to transform the velocities back to the rest frame.

Oh crap. 2.6 is the speed of the objects after an inelastic collisions. I have been using the wrong number the whole time. Let me try it the right way... Is the velocity 7.67 m/s?

GOT IT! 33cm is the rebound height.

When I did finally get the correct FINAL velocity for the mass, it was -2.6. Is this just a coincidence that this is the same as the 2.6 that I thought was the initial velocity? Anyway, thank you!
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top